Hey guys some time ago I was on the forums and asked for help... I grew alot since then but I still feel there is a huge room for improvement at the time when this was anotated I couldn't comment but now I can and I will so I hope you will have more tips looking trough the game real quick I realise it has been to long ago and my playstyle took a different direction... I will anotate a game soon and put it up on the forum

just wanted to add thank you this realy helped me alot 

I think the quick g4 highlights an important element to chess which is planning. The idea behind 4. g4 is a sound one. At the high school that I work at I use chess all the time to teach students the ideas and skills being used for excellent decision making. As teacher chess is a great way for me to get to the bottom of how a student makes their decisions(they will use the same model as the do in every other aspect of their life). It helps me instruct them on important ideas like cause and effect, predicting outcomes, determination verse fatalism etc.

White may have been able to avoid the pin with 4. Nc3 Nf6 5. g4!?

Whte must be aware of the weakness on the dark squares after g4. This means that now, after the black'e pawn is moved (e6, say), the queen is ready to go to h4+, that is very disruptive for white. And the defence against it is the knight, but the knight is pinned. Once moved e6, white can easily exchange BxN, then Qh4+. White must be aware of this threat in its following moves. This is the counterside of having won the "tempoes" on the black bishop.

In my opinion, Black should have develop on of his knights, or take White's knight on f3.If White plays exf3, he has doubled pawns, and also the e file is... how to say... too empty for White.

In spite of the multiple moves by Black's Bishop, he is not far behind in development, since both players would still have all pieces on the back rank after the exchange on f3. Also, after 5...Bxf3 exf3, White would need to queen-side castle in order to secure his kings safety. Yet this q-side castling process is very time consuming seeing he has no development on that side. Therefore I would say Black is better here.

With this move, white ensures a knight will be on f3. And a knight in f3 covers h4 - as for previous comment. But, having the queen in d6, this is not a priority anymore, so this move just gives away a pawn. True is that white has then a free move, since when the knight moves the queen is attacked by the bishop on c1. BUT the queen has - again - a black square penetration on g3(+!) and the poor white king has to move to d2. So the played move is not a good idea for white.

I think one major lesson white can learn from this game is to avoid gambits. As a rule gambits(the sacrifice of material for something better) is usually unsound. The former world Champion Anataloy Karpov made a living of S.O.S moves. (S)imple: avoid risky and complicated moves (O)ffensive: play moves that have an immediate goal or objective i.e threaten to win material. (S)upported: every piece should be protected and supported by the others.

Maybe Black couldn't find out how to "persuade" White's king to move towards the centre bravely, because he wouldn't have problems there.

Well, I sometimes prefer to have a queen to have a knight and a rook, because of the well-known move, to check one's king and to attack an undefended piece at the same time. And if White wanted to exchange his knight and rook for a queen, after Black has completed the exchange, Black would have his bishop on h1, quite close to White's army, undefendedly! He may have played Be4 in order to have it defended, but after exchanging a knight for that bishop, black would have his pawn on e4, and it would become free meat soon.

why not f1

Good question. 9.Nf1 Bb4+ 10.c3 Bxc3+ 11.bxc3 Qxc3+ 12.Bd2 Qa3 and Black has 4 pawns for the bishop. The move played is much the best choice.

'Simplifying' is always worth bearing in mind when you are material ahead - expecially exchanging pieces (not pawns so much - the less so if there are few remaining). It is usually to be avoided if you are material behind, though you might be inclined to reduce the number of pawns (the fewer the better). With material even, exchanging has to be well-motivated to be justified - one of those judgement calls that becomes finer with practice and experience.

Clearly better to play Qxf7+, because after it, 13.Qxf7 Kd8 14.Nxe6+ If Kc8 now, Qe8 is checkmate. Only move to prevent if black sacrifices his queen for the knight on e6 checking the king, and after, White's queen ,which is trying to confuse Black, simply could take Black's queen.

As I have indicated, White gets only a small material advantage in the 14.Nxe6+ line. By 14.Qxf8+, he still wins the Queen but picks up a Bishop and Rook as well. The two exclams I gave 14.Qxf8+ goes to the fact that the inferior alternative, 14.Nxe6+, seems so obviously good.