I don't know the names of many openings usually I just play what seems OK.- The Snowman

I am the same!

Good move that behind its quiet beginning has aggressive - or should I say 'counter-aggressive' - intentions. I don't play it myself, but have occasionally essayed the related Modern Defence (a.k.a. Robatsch-Kotov-Ufimtsev-Uncle Tom Cobbleigh Defence) 2...g6. Both can easily transpose into a king's Indian if White plays an early c2-c4.

Not precisely a 'disadvantage', as the Pirc player pretty much has to count on White seizing the centre in this way. The strategy behind the opening is to allow White to over-extend himself, so that a strike at the centre will induce a collapse.

Starting to look 'Modern-ish'...  

I have found the same in my experience and have usually regretted having d e and f all on the same row

Main lines are f4 or Nf3. f4 is the most aggressive approach, and the one that leaves the most difficult positions. f4 here is called the Austrian Attack.

This move is fine - the Austrian Attack is a powerful weapon against the Pirc/Modern Defences. Strictly speaking, as this is now a Modern Defence, this is the Pseudo-Austrian Attack. Whatever, White does have to take care he doesn't overpress to the point that leaves himself vulnerable to counter-attack.

Yes I don't know why I played this it doesn't seem logical. I think Nd7 is better preparation for e5.

Bad move, It blocks the Ng8. Main line here: Nf6. Other possible move is c5, e5 or Nd7

I am disinclined to criticize this move overmuch. We are definitely down the Modern leg of this complex of defences, where almost anything is worth a crack. However, looking at my ancient Keene & Botterill Batsford book, I find it gives as the main lines 4...c5?! (5.dxc5!); 4...c6; 4...Nc6. The authors also mention 4...f5; 4...e6; 4...Nd7; 4...Nh6; 4...Na6; 4...a6 as 'playable' (their quotation marks). Of these Alex Kotov has played 4...a6 with success. So maybe we are looking at a 'novelty' here - possibly - if it's any good - a 'theoretical novelty.'

I liked more 6. Bc4, taking the white squares.

Yes I was hoping White would initiate some exchanges here although I felt reluctant to initiate them myself.

This pawn thrust looks a little bit premature. I think I'd be inclined to play something like 8...Bxf3 9.Bxf3 Nge7 10.d5 Nb8. Yes, that does constitute a loss of time, but Black's position remains solid, and ...f5 comes seriously into consideration before of after ....0-0.

White bishop is the bad one for Blacks, so playing: 9. .. Bxf3 10 Bxf3 Nd4, black manage to play active

I suspect that Black felt that to exchange Bishop for knight here would meet with the opprobrium of a stock thinking world  . But in my view that exchange is the justification for moving the bishop to g4 anyhow (in this game). The game is likely to be a 'closed' one, in which knights might well prove handier than bishops.

Better was Ng5 and then Ne6.. a HUGE knight.

Did almost play that but didn't like opening the line to my lsb and saw that the N going to e6 could be defended against (not that I made the right choice). Did go there eventually. Thanks.

the suggestion made by alex388 is a further reason for Black to play ...Bxf3 betimes.

I wanted to hurry as fast as I could to castle Queenside but by playing Qd7 it is too late to stop the pesky knight coming to g5 and e6. I think I should have playedh6 first.

It seems that Black really had to deal ASAP with the threat of the knight's incursion to e6. Hence, 12...h6 seems to be indicated. Having said that, 12 moves have gone by and Black hasn't really managed to get any counter-action going. Prospects do not look promising.