|
« TAP TO LOG IN
|
ANNOTATED GAME
Bishop - Knight end game Mate! Rare/Interesting/Tough!
berbatov (1793) vs. e-motion (1616)
Annotated by: jugoslavija
(2013)
Chess opening: QGD Slav defence (D10), exchange variation
berbatov (1793) vs. e-motion (1616)
Annotated by: jugoslavija
(2013)
Chess opening: QGD Slav defence (D10), exchange variation
 Interactive |
• |  Show all comments |
• | All annotated games | • | View chessboard as: |
| ||||||
|
1. d4 |
A very interesting end game. The Bishop and Knight Mate is the most difficult of the so-called "elementary" mates and there is nothing elementary about them for a beginner player.... or even a more experienced one. It is a very rare ending but it is a very useful to learn how to do this, otherwise the game will sure to be thrown into a draw either due to 50 move rule, or a stalemate. This would be off course unfortunate because it is a won game, but one must know exactly what to do. I will deal with this more in detail toward the end but for right now lets begin: | |||||
| | ||||||
|
1... d5 |
I am dealing clearly with a superior player so my strategy in such matches is always the same: MUST TAKE RISKS or else I won't stand a chance. (I will probably lose either way, but if I take a risk I have at least a remote chance of surprising my opponent and create an interesting game). | |||||
| | ||||||
|
2. c4 |
In all of my wins against 1800 players (berbatov was ranked over 1800 at the time we started), it always happened in the same way: Develop a board "feature" and then take advantage of it. You will see what I mean by that in the coming moves. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
2... c6 3. cxd5 cxd5 |
So far standard opening. I was going for a Slav defense since that seems to be a less played game around here, and it takes some people by surprise. Exchange variation. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
4. Nc3 Nc6 |
Not fully familiar with this development but again, I am willing to take chances against berbatov. | |||||
| 2 comments | ||||||
|
5. Nf3 g6 6. Qb3 e6 7. Bg5 |
Awkward move for me. I did not like it, but there it was and I had to deal with it. I took my time to play my next move. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
7... f6 |
I was forced to ruin my king side protection for the castling. The bishop position was so dangerous, that I felt I had no option. | |||||
| 3 comments | ||||||
|
8. Bf4 Bg7 9. e3 |
After this move, I started feeling better about that development. Fianchetto in place, his dark bishop squeezed, my castling options still alive. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
9... a6 |
Passive, but against a stronger players, I put more emphasis on developing than attacking. I really don't want his Nb5. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
10. a3 Nge7 |
Preparing to castle. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
11. Bd3 |
berbatov developing further. Again, something I noticed a higher ranked players tend to do. More emphasis on a development. It usually creates a richer and more complex game, with greater number of possibilities. That makes sense considering that a higher number of strong pieces are involved in the game. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
11... e5 |
I am starting to exploit the Bishop's position, and I am pushing my pawns. Pawn game is in general not a good strategy against a stronger player, but that Bishop was asking for it. In addition I get to push my pawn in the center. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
12. dxe5 fxe5 13. Bg5 |
Darn, I knew that that Bishop will be a pest. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
13... e4 |
I really wanted to gain some center control and some piece advantage. I sacrificed my King's protection to do this, and I knew this. I was willing to take that chance. Note that he has a lot of heavy artillery pointed in the direction of my King's area. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
14. Bxe4 dxe4 15. Nxe4 |
I am a pawn up, but my King seems naked. I am sure berbatov was fine with this. I am a bit underdeveloped to boot. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
15... Qa5+ |
Here I gain a tempo move. I figured I gained a pawn advantage, but he had position on me. If I could gain a tempo move, maybe I make up for the position disadvantage and perhaps retain my piece advantage. | |||||
| 1 comment | ||||||
|
16. Ned2 Qb5 17. Qxb5 axb5 |
This was another result of Qb5 I was aiming for. I wanted to develop a "feature", namely an early a-file opening. And this is the formula I have followed in the past against superior opponents. Now my job is not to let that feature go to waste, and hopefully take advantage of it. I might end up sacrificing few pieces on the way, but I need to be on a look out to maximize this a-file opening. This now becomes my sole focus. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
18. O-O-O |
berbatov didn't seem to be concerned with the a-file threat.... I wonder why, because now my mission is starting to crystallize. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
18... b4 |
You see where I am going with this. | |||||
| | ||||||
|
19. Nc4 |
I didn't like this move. It was threatening my King with Nd6. Also, his rook is poised to strike since d-file is clear. I had to abandon my attack temporarily and castle immediately. | |||||
| | ||||||
| ||||||