|
|
1. e4
|
I realize neither this game nor I am particularly good. I just wanted to annotate something for my own benefit. |

|
|
|
1... c5
|
The best response to e4 in my opinion. e5 tends to turn into an uninteresting game. |
2 comments
|
|
|
2. d4
|
A bit unexpected, but playable. Better would be to stick to theory and play Nf3. |
2 comments
|
|
|
2... cxd4
|
Natural move. |

|
|
|
3. Qxd4 Nc6
|
Develops with tempo. |
3 comments
|
|
|
4. Qe3 g6
|
Preparing to fianchetto the bishop, seems like a sound decision. |
1 comment
|
|
|
5. Bb5
|
? Not completely sure what this accomplishes, although it does develop a piece and applies pressure towards the king. |
2 comments
|
|
|
5... Bg7
|
Following through. |

|
|
|
6. Bxc6
|
Better to develop more pieces than to trade mindlessly. |

|
|
|
6... dxc6
|
Opens up a file for the queen, and later the rook. As well, keeps the pawn islands. |
2 comments
|
|
|
7. e5
|
Slightly premature pushing of the pawn, although it does block off the bishop nicely. |

|
|
|
7... Bf5
|
Develops other bishop while attacking at the same time. |
2 comments
|
|
|
8. Na3
|
Awkward way of defending the pawn. |

|
|
|
8... Qc7
|
Threatening the e pawn as well as making way for the rook to come through. |
1 comment
|
|
|
9. Nf3
|
Solid move, prepares to castle, defends the pawn, develops a piece. |

|
|
|
9... O-O-O
|
I decide the queenside is safe for castling, and since it activates the rook at the same time, it seemed like a good move. |
3 comments
|
|
|
10. Ng5
|
Threatening a fork that is hard to defend against. |

|
|
|
10... Nh6
|
I debated playing Bg6 instead, but thought the bishop would have a strong diagonal once the e pawn is gone. |
2 comments
|
|
|
11. Nxf7
|
Blunder as far as I know. |
2 comments
|
|
|
11... Nxf7 12. f4
|
Best way of defending the pawn. |

|
|
|