Ever play a game and miss the dumbest mate ever? Well I did. Watch my incredible debacle. |
|
1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5
|
The Trompowsky Attack! Unusual but perfectly okay. |

|
|
|
2... h6
|
?! Not as good as the normal responses: Ne4, e6, or d5. Still, this forces white to decide what to do with the bishop. |

|
|
|
3. Bh4 g5
|
I decide to develop my kingside aggressively. Perhaps Bg7, d6, and Bf5 are in the cards for me, leading to an interesting kingside presence and then most likely Nd7 and a queenside castle. |

|
|
|
4. Bg3 Ne4
|
?! Wasting time to go after the bishop when I know I should be playing either Bg7 or d6 (or even d5). |

|
|
|
5. Be5
|
Also not a very strong move; sure it threatens the rook but white should be developing his pieces. |

|
|
|
5... f6
|
?! This isn't a very good move; it exposes black's kingside significantly. Better was Nf6 or Rg8. |
1 comment
|
|
|
6. e3
|
Such an innocuous move, when the only thing I had considered at this point was 6. Bg3 Nxg3 where white has a disrupted pawn structure and black can begin development. |

|
|
|
6... fxe5
|
?? Loses immediately. A stupid capture that shows my blindness. Why? |

|
|
|
7. Qh5#
|
Augh! It's like Fool's Mate, and I fell for it! Merry Christmas, NN. |
3 comments
|
|