|
|
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3
|
Another options are 3. Nd2 (Tarrasch) and 3. e5 (Nimzowitsch). |

|
|
|
3... dxe4
|
My Latvian opponent had previously played 3...Nf6; 4. Bg5, Be7; 5. e5, Nfd7; 6. h4!? c5; 7. Bxe7, Kxe7. Another possibility is 3...Bb4 (Winawer). |

|
|
|
4. Nxe4 Nd7 5. Bd3
|
The main line is 5. Nf3. |

|
|
|
5... Ngf6 6. Qe2 c5 7. Nxf6+ Nxf6 8. dxc5 Bxc5 9. Bd2
|
9. Nf3 is played more often. 9. Bg5!? Qa5 ; 10. Bd2, Qc7; 11. 0-0-0, 0-0 was seen at Polgar - Ehlvest, Vienna 1996. Better was 9...h6, 10. Bb5 , Bd7; 11. Bxd7 , Qxd7; 12. Bxf6, gxf6; 13. Rd1, Qc6 as in Fedorov - Van Wely, Istambul ol 2000. |

|
|
|
9... O-O 10. O-O-O Qd5
|
10...Bd7; 11. Nf3 Weeks - De Andrés, Hamburg 2005. |

|
|
|
11. Kb1
|
11. Bc3, Qg5 . |

|
|
|
11... Qxg2
|
11...e5 is definitely safer. |

|
|
|
12. Nf3 Qxf2 13. Qe5
|
White has ample compensation for the pawns. |

|
|
|
13... Nd7
|
13...Be7; 14. Rdf1, Qc5; 15. Qg3 and White has a strong attack, Khalifman - Bareev, Corus Wijk aan Zee 2002. |

|
|
|
14. Bxh7+
|
Here it comes! |

|
|
|
14... Kxh7
|
Finkel recommends 14...Kh8; 15. Qg3, Nf6, but White is still up after 16. Bd3! |

|
|
|
15. Qh5+ Kg8 16. Rhg1 Be3
|
Protecting h6... |

|
|
|
17. Bxe3
|
17. Bc3 was played by Anand against Van Wely in 2001. |

|
|
|
17... Qxe3 18. Rg3 Qf4
|
18...Qc5?? 19. Qh6 1-0 Morozevich - Van Wely, Corus Wijk aan Zee, 26.1.2002. No easy life is expecting Black, anyway... |

|
|
|
19. Rdg1
|
Of course! |

|
|
|
19... Rd8 20. Nd2
|
The key move! 20. Nd2! intends Rf3, heading to f7. The Queen is not allowed to abandon the f file. |

|
|
|
20... g6
|
20...Kf8; 21. Rf3, Nf6; 22. Qh8 , Ke7; 23. Qxd8 , Kxd8; 24. Rxf4 was Black's best option... unsufficient to equalize, however. |

|
|
|
21. Rf3
|
According to plan! |
1 comment
|
|
|
21... Qxf3
|
21...Qf5; 22. Rxf5, exf5; 23. Qxf5, Nf8; 24. Qf2 was not enough, either. |

|
|
|
22. Nxf3 b6 23. h4
|
The attack has not vanished, yet! |

|
|
|