|
|
1. d4
|
This is another game I played against Alex, a friend of mine. ( see annotated game: Nimzo Indian Defence. ) |

|
|
|
1... Nf6
|
Sticking with his primary weapon against 1.d4, Alex plays the Indian Defence 1..Nf6. |

|
|
|
2. c4 g6
|
This time Alex decides to play 2..g6 instead of 2..e6. |

|
|
|
3. Nc3
|
Forcing black to make a commitment, as to wether to play the Gruenfeld, or to play 3..Bg7, allowing white to play the move e4, wich would stop the Gruenfeld. |

|
|
|
3... d5
|
Alex plays 3..d5, entering the Gruenfeld defence. |

|
|
|
4. Bg5
|
The Stockholm variation. I saw Vassily Ivanchuk play this move in a game against Peter Svidler and decided to play it against Alex... |

|
|
|
4... dxc4
|
A bit dissapointing...I was expecting the main line 4..Ne4 |

|
|
|
5. e3
|
( 5.e4 is stronger. ) |

|
|
|
5... Be6
|
? 5..Bg7 would have been more consistent. |

|
|
|
6. Bxf6
|
To play d5 on the next move. |

|
|
|
6... exf6 7. d5 Bf5 8. e4
|
( See the note at move 5. ) |

|
|
|
8... Qe7 9. Qe2 Bc8
|
The bishop must retreat since the square d7 is needed for the development of the knight. |

|
|
|
10. Qxc4 Bh6
|
Since the light-squared bishop is driven back, Alex decides to try his luck with his dark-squared bishop. |

|
|
|
11. Nf3
|
To answer 11...f5 with 12.e5 |

|
|
|
11... O-O 12. Bd3 Bg4
|
The bishop is back! |

|
|
|
13. Nd4 f5
|
! |

|
|
|
14. h3 fxe4 15. Nxe4 Bf5 16. Ne2 Qe5
|
! Now the square e5 is a strong post for black's pieces. The black queen is aiming at pawn b2. |

|
|
|
17. Ne4c3 Bxd3 18. Qxd3 Nd7
|
Black plans to move the knight to c5. |

|
|
|
19. O-O Rfe8 20. Rfe1 Nc5 21. Qc2 Rad8 22. Kf1
|
!? Threatening discovered attacks at the black Queen. Also, the King moves to a light square, where it's less likely to be checked, since the black pieces seem to be moving more on the dark squares.. |

|
|
|
22... b6
|
(If black tries to play ...Qh2, white plays Ng3.) |

|
|
|