Ivory Rook!
Sarasani (-) vs. Rampersad, W. (1549)
Annotated by:
sarasani (1868)
Chess opening:
QGD (D06), symmetrical (Austrian) defence
|
|
|
1. d4
|
Hi everyone! Here is an instructive game I played at my local chessclub RSR Ivoren Toren in Rotterdam, the Netherlands (hence the name of this game).
I needed this win to be able to qualify for promotion to the next group and quite coincidentally I got the white pieces against Rampersad.
A couple of weeks ago I was present when he was analyzing one of his games where he also had the black pieces and they had played the QGD, symmetrical variation, wich ended in a draw. But I had checked out the opening at home and found a small improvement for white, so now it was a good opportunity to show it! Enjoy... |

|
| |
|
|
1... d5 2. c4
|
At this point ofcourse I was wondering:''Will he play 2...c5?''. I remember the adrenaline pumping trough my body.... |

|
| |
|
|
2... c5
|
Yes...ofcourse, like I said, the last game he played with this variation ended in a draw ( against the leading player in our group ), so why not try it again... |

|
| |
|
|
3. cxd5
|
The best move here. |

|
| |
|
|
3... Qxd5
|
Going for the same line he played against Fung*.
*( M. Fung was the leading player at the moment in our group with a current KNSB rating of 1816. The game I played against him ended in a quick draw.)
|

|
| |
|
|
4. Nf3
|
! Though not really worthy of an exclamation mark, this move is my first improvement. Fung had played 4.Nc3 when the game continued with 4...Qxd4 5.Qxd4 (5.Nf3!) 5....cxd4 6.Nb5 Kd8 6.Nxd4 |

|
| |
|
|
4... cxd4
|
The most common continuation. |

|
| |
|
|
5. Nc3
|
This is all known theory ofcourse. Black has two common responses, 5...Qa5 and 5...Qd8. But allready white has won a tempo, since the queen must retreat. |

|
| |
|
|
5... Qd8
|
White has developed both knights, while black has yet to develop a piece! |

|
| |
|
|
6. Nxd4
|
It's more common to take with the queen here, but I decided I didn't want to swap queens, going for sharp play and avoiding a draw. |

|
| |
|
|
6... Nf6
|
Black has to start bringing his pieces into action. |

|
| |
|
|
7. Bg5 e6 8. e3 Be7
|
Both sides developing their pieces... |

|
| |
|
|
9. Bd3 Bd7 10. O-O Nc6 11. a3
|
Perhaps 11.Nf3 is slightly better here, but I wanted to stop the c6-knight from jumping to b4, since I was planning to move my queen to c2. |

|
| |
|
|
11... Nxd4 12. exd4 Qb6
|
The queen attacks both pawns on b2 and d4. |

|
| |
|
|
13. Qc2 Rc8
|
Pinning the knight on c3. |

|
| |
|
|
14. Rad1
|
!? This pawn sacrifice is just too tempting. |

|
| |
|
|
14... Qxd4
|
To say this is a blunder goes too far, but I would have considered another move here. Actually 14...h6!? is the best chance for black here; 15.Be3 O-O with a more or less equal position. |

|
| |
|
|
15. Bb5
|
Now white has a clear edge, because the black king is in a vulnerable position, for example 15...Qg4 16.Bxd7 Nxd7 17.Bxe7 Kxe7. |

|
| |
|
|
15... Qc5
|
Ok...what now? I'm still a pawn down... |

|
| |
|
|
16. Bxd7+
|
? Computer analysis shows a better alternative here: 16.Bxf6 Bxb5 17.Bxg7 Bxf1 18.Bxh8 wich is winning for white. But hey, my name is not Fritz, so I came up with another plan... |

|
| |
|