|
|
1. e4 e5 2. b3
|
Nimzovich-Larsen attack, modern variation |

|
|
|
2... Nf6 3. Bb2 Nc6
|
So far by the book |

|
|
|
4. d4 Bb4+
|
Black Bishop puts pressure on my king ( not a strong move) because c3 makes black bishop retreat and lose tempo |

|
|
|
5. c3 Ba5 6. d5
|
i futher gain momentum by attacking the knight |

|
|
|
6... Ne7 7. Nd2
|
development |

|
|
|
7... c5
|
black is trying to counteract my control of the center, while giving an escape route for his black bishop |

|
|
|
8. Ngf3 Ng6
|
Black Development |

|
|
|
9. Nc4
|
Attacking e5 pawn, Developing the strenght of my knights, while sacrificing e4 pawn |

|
|
|
9... Nxe4 10. Qc2
|
moving 10. Qc2, im defending c3 pawn from blacks evil intentions, while i cause black knight to retreat and lose additional tempo. |

|
|
|
10... Nf6 11. Nd6+
|
Now that d6 Square is occupied by my knight, i can start my offense |

|
|
|
11... Ke7 12. Nf5+ Kf8
|
putting black king in less defensive position while restricting H rook |

|
|
|
13. d6
|
A nice move, further restricting black movements |

|
|
|
13... Ne8
|
black is looking for ways to remove pawn threat |

|
|
|
14. O-O-O
|
defending the d pawn |

|
|
|
14... Qf6 15. Bd3
|
development, while in creasing pressure on the diagonal |

|
|
|
15... Nf4 16. Rhe1
|
I'm thinking my G pawn is not as important as black e Pawn, if the exchange takes place i'll have a powerful e file |

|
|
|
16... g6
|
I suppose i can remove my knight to g3, but I'm thinking sacrifice here!
|

|
|
|
17. Rxe5 gxf5 18. Rxf5
|
While -2pts Im attacking Knight, queen and putting pressure on f7 pawn |

|
|
|
18... Qxd6
|
I believe i had better move at this position Ng5 putting dbl pressure on f7 square
But i missed that move and played Bc4 |

|
|
|
19. Bc4 Nd5 20. Bxd5
|
I didnt anticipate the following defense combo |

|
|
|