chess online
« TAP TO LOG IN

ANNOTATED GAME

Why to take the pawn on f4 in a king's gambit
oogiegork (1500) vs. varsity (1547)
Annotated by: ravster (1200)
Chess opening: King's gambit (C30)
Interactive Show all comments All annotated games View chessboard as:
1. e4
Hello and welcome to my annotated game. This game is played by someone I know from school (oogiegork) and shows that it can be dangerous game if there is a king gambit played, and this shows what can happen even if you don't take the pawn on f4!
1 comment
 
1... e5 2. f4
Like I said, there is a king gambit.

 
2... f6
I personally think that you should not do this because moving a kingside pawn in a opening is dangerous, even when you can take the pawn on f4 and defend badly on the next few moves. But these players are better than me, so I cannot talk.
3 comments
 
3. fxe5
Black thinks that white is offering a fair exchange.
1 comment
 
3... fxe5
And so he takes the pawn on e5
2 comments
 
4. Qh5+
However, this has turned out that it was not a fair exchange after all! For not only he moved a kingside pawn, he also captured a piece, leaving a path where white can check black, making it unable to castle for the rest of the game and take the pawn on e5 next move (fork).
1 comment
 
4... Ke7 5. Qxe5+
And not only white took the pawn on e5, he has got the black king on the run!

 
5... Kf7
Black must be in agony :)

 
6. Bc4+ Kg6 7. Qf5+
At this point, balck resigned perhaps because of agony. Thank you for watching this annotated game, and please rate this game, and good luck on all your current and future matches :)
4 comments