|
|
|
11. a3
|
All I think is: "Yeah he is trading his second bishop for my knight, sweet!". This is a wasted move as Black wants to trade. |

|
| |
|
|
11... Bxc3
|
Chop! |

|
| |
|
|
12. Bxc3
|
I don't want to ruin my pawn structure with 12. bxc3 so I take with my bishop. This is what black wants... My message to tag1153 said "You're trading away your second bishop for my knight?" |

|
| |
|
|
12... Nd5
|
"Yeah, so I can remove your two bishop advantage!" Throwing me the fork that Black was planning all along! Nice combination tag1153! |
1 comment
|
| |
|
|
13. Qd2
|
Moving away and as well as saving the pawn structure. |

|
| |
|
|
13... Nxc3
|
The advantage of the two bishops are gone... |

|
| |
|
|
14. Qxc3
|
And my queen has been all over the board... but she'll do plenty more running later, don't you worry. :-) |
1 comment
|
| |
|
|
14... Nd7
|
Developing the last knight. |
1 comment
|
| |
|
|
15. Qd2
|
I get the chance to change defender of the d4 pawn as I don't want my queen as the primary defender. I seriously regret not playing 10. Ne2 |

|
| |
|
|
15... Nf6
|
Moving the knight to a good square with tempo as the queen attacks d4 yet again. |

|
| |
|
|
16. c3
|
The proper defender of d4. All queenside pawns are now on black squares, which is good as I have a white bishop. |

|
| |
|
|
16... O-O
|
Castle to safety. |

|
| |
|
|
17. O-O
|
Ditto. |
1 comment
|
| |
|
|
17... Re8
|
Centralizing the rook. |

|
| |
|
|
18. Rfe1
|
I do as well. |

|
| |
|
|
18... Qc7
|
Connecting the rooks as well as lining up on the h2-b8 diagonal targeting the castled kings position. |

|
| |
|
|
19. Qc2
|
Forming a queen-bishop battery. |

|
| |
|
|
19... h6
|
Weakening the defense of the white squares, but freeing the knight from the defense of the h7-pawn. |

|
| |
|
|
20. Qe2
|
My thought at the time was to stop e5. |

|
| |
|
|
20... a6
|
When played I didn't see the reason for this move. But it might make sense later. |

|
| |
|