|
|
22. Nd6+ Kc7 23. Bf4
|
! This makes black's defense difficult due to the double check of Ne8. After 24.Ne8 (if it was white's move here):
a) 24... Kb6 25.Qd6 Ka5 26.dxe8=Q is easily winning or 25... Kb5 26.Nc7 or 24... Kb7 25.Qc7 Ka8 26.exd8=Q
b) 24... Kc8 25.Qa8 instantly would end the game. |

|
|
|
23... Kb6
|
! Black avoids that potential check, though I'd be scared to have my king so far out. |

|
|
|
24. Nxc4+ Kb5
|
And the king is drawn forward, but white simply doesn't have enough to win it. |

|
|
|
25. Nd6+ Kb6 26. exd8=B+
|
Tossing in a check, but it's doesn't win the game. |

|
|
|
26... Rxd8 27. Nc4+ Kb5 28. Nd6+ Kb6 29. Nc4+
|
So here they drew, but were there any alternatives, what about 29.a4 but after 29... bxa3 30.Nxc4 Qxc4! 31.Qxc4 a2 and the strong pawn makes the position un-win-able for white. So what about an earlier a4? 28.a4 and both takebacks are interesting:
28... Kxa4 29.b3 Kxb3 and there are discoveries but black has great pawns for stopping checks, and he should be fine.
28... Qxa4 29.Nd6 Ka5 (29... Kb6 30.Qb7 mates) and again I doubt that white's got more than a perpetual.
I hope you enjoyed this lively game that seems to draw doubt upon the move 19.Qd5. It's a great theoretical dispute, and I wish more players played the botvinnik so that we could see more of these kinds of developments. Perhaps I'll annotate a game with 19.Kxf1 next or with 16.Na4. If you have comments I'd love to hear them. |

|
|
|