|
|
|
1. e4
|
Notes by myself :p |

|
| |
|
|
1... e6
|
The French defense is now my only answer against 1.e4 |

|
| |
|
|
2. d4 d5 3. Nd2
|
The Tarasch variation: white's knight can't be pinned by Bb4 and the c3 square can be occupied by a pawn |

|
| |
|
|
3... Nf6
|
3...c5 is the main line, but this move is less drawish and equally good |

|
| |
|
|
4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 Qb6
|
The old main line... It allows white less options than 7...cxd4 8. cxd4 f6 which is also good |

|
| |
|
|
8. Nf3 cxd4 9. cxd4 f6 10. exf6 Nxf6 11. O-O Bd6 12. b3 O-O 13. Bf4
|
!? Bb2 is more common |

|
| |
|
|
13... Nxd4
|
the old d5-fork trick (but on the other side of the board!) |

|
| |
|
|
14. Nfxd4 e5 15. Be3 exd4 16. Bxd4 Bc5 17. Rc1 Bxd4 18. Nxd4 Bd7 19. Qd2 Rae8 20. Rfe1 Ne4
|
Here i hoped that the isolated pawn would have given me more attacking chances on e4... Fortunately I was right |
1 comment
|
| |
|
|
21. Bxe4 dxe4 22. Nc2
|
Trying to create a blockade on e3 |

|
| |
|
|
22... Bc6
|
!? risky move, because if white succeeded in blockading the pawn, this bishop would become very passive |

|
| |
|
|
23. Qd4
|
going for exchanges |
2 comments
|
| |
|
|
23... Qb5
|
24. Qxa7 Ra8 is not good for white, so I can avoid the exchange |

|
| |
|
|
24. Red1
|
Preventing Rd8 |

|
| |
|
|
24... Qg5
|
Preparing Rd8 |
1 comment
|
| |
|
|
25. a4
|
Threatening Qxa7 |

|
| |
|
|
25... Red8
|
! Allowing Qxa7... I have a good attack which is probably enough compensation |
1 comment
|
| |
|
|
26. Qxa7 Rd3 27. b4
|
? This pawns will become very weak, maybe Qb6 was better... |

|
| |
|
|
27... Qf4
|
threatening e3 |

|
| |
|
|
28. Rde1
|
28. Rf1? Rh3! is crushing, but maybe 28. Ne1 is a better defense |

|
| |
|
|
28... e3
|
! this pawn is attacked 4 times and can't be taken... |

|
| |
|