|
|
14. Bh3
|
The most logical consolidation. But can White accelerate his attack on the other flank by offering more material? 14.b6 Kxb6 15.Nc4 (15.Rb1 might be worth a look) 15...Ka7 (no choice) 16.Ne5 Qe8 (...Qh4 seems to lead nowhere) 17.Rb1 Nc6 (17...Nd7!? 18.Nxd7!? Qxd7 19.Nxc5 Qc7 20.Rxb7 Qxb7 21.Nxb7 Kxb7 22.Bf5 with an ending difficult to assess) 18.Nxc5 Nd8 19.Bd7 Qh5 20.Nxe4... and White looks to have a fine game. |

|
|
|
14... Nd7
|
Developing a piece at last. Black's problem has been that White has given her little chance to bring out her pieces... |

|
|
|
15. O-O
|
...but in saying that, one has to admit that White has had to employ pieces already developed. Now comes a lull in the battle as reserves are called up. |

|
|
|
15... Qh5
|
(!?) So far, Black has done nothing wrong that I can see, but one feels a bit uncomfortable with this move. However, Black had to do something about her K-side, and this move frees the g-pawn, should she get the chance to advance it and bring out her bishop. But maybe ...h6 was worth a look, keeping the knight out of g5, and thereby making it harder for White to bring the h3-bishop into e6. Such a regrouping by White does happen later on. |

|
|
|
16. Bb2
|
Pinning the g7-pawn and tying down Black's K-flank. |

|
|
|
16... Rg8
|
(?!) Now, had White chosen, he could have carried out at once the regrouping earlier mentioned: 17.Ng5 Nf6 18.Be6. |

|
|
|
17. Rad1
|
(!?) A 'mysterious' rook move. Did White envisage breaking out with his d-pawn, or was this played against a possible 17...Qd5, attacking d2? A difficult move to understand, I find. |
1 comment
|
|
|
17... Nb6 18. Kh1
|
Playing almost as if he hadn't a care in the world... ;-) |
3 comments
|
|
|
18... Rc8
|
(!?) Possibly Black ought to have been seeking ways to unravel her K-side. 18...g6 or maybe 18...h6 offered some prospects of breaking out of the bind. |

|
|
|
19. Rde1
|
I suspect a rethink has taken place since White's 17th... |
1 comment
|
|
|
19... Qd5
|
Good: centralisation - but also eyeing a couple of loose White pawns... |

|
|
|
20. Ng5
|
Discovering an attack against Black's c8-rook, and threatening a fork against her other major pieces - this looks devastating. Does that mean Black's previous was a mistake after all? I'm not sure it does. It was looking likely that to free up her game, Black would have to give back something. Now with 20....Qxd2 21.Bxc8 Nxc8 22.Bc1 Qd5 Black might have gained time enough to complete her development. |

|
|
|
20... Qxa2
|
(?) Wrong pawn, methinks... |
1 comment
|
|
|
21. Reb1
|
(!) Now Black must shed material. How best to do this? |

|
|
|
21... Qxb1
|
(?) Quite understandable attempt to cut her losses, but it might have been better to have kept her most active piece, and let a rook go instead. After 21...Qd5 22.Be6 Qxd2 23.Bxg8 e3, Black at least has some counterplay.
After this capture, it is hard to see how Black can survive. |
1 comment
|
|
|
22. Rxb1 Ra8 23. bxa6 bxa6 24. Be6 Rh8
|
Although material parity has been approximately restored, White has retained his spatial and temporal advantages. Black's K-side is so tied up that White is effectively playing with a rook and bishop extra. |
1 comment
|
|
|
25. Nf7 Rg8 26. Be5
|
(!) Centralisation! Also good was 26.Ne5, but the move played is more effective, and the more visually pleasing. |

|
|
|
26... h6 27. Bc7
|
Closing in for the kill. Black is busted. I gather Joanne considered resigning hereabouts, but agreed to play out the mate. |
2 comments
|
|
|
27... Na4 28. Bd5
|
Heralding a mate in 5... |

|
|
|
28... Re8 29. Rb7+
|
According to the mating sequence already envisaged. It turns out that Black's previous move allowed a different, slightly quicker one. Can you find it? [Answer: 27.Nb5 mates in three.] |

|
|
|