|
« TAP TO LOG IN
|
ANNOTATED GAME
Is development crucial?
Adolf Andersson (N/A) vs. Paul Morphy (N/A)
Annotated by: tomwhufc (1200)
Chess opening: KGA (C33), bishop's gambit, Cozio (Morphy) defence
Adolf Andersson (N/A) vs. Paul Morphy (N/A)
Annotated by: tomwhufc (1200)
Chess opening: KGA (C33), bishop's gambit, Cozio (Morphy) defence
 Interactive |
• |  Show all comments |
• | All annotated games | • | View chessboard as: |
| |||||
|
20. h4 h6 21. hxg5 hxg5 22. g3 |
This is Anderssons last attempt to salvage his position. | ||||
| | |||||
|
22... Rb6 23. Ra2 Rg6 |
Whit this move black secures his kingside. | ||||
| | |||||
|
24. Rg2 Bh3 25. e6 Bxg2 26. exf7+ Kg7 27. Kxg2 Qc8 |
Now with blacks next few moves black gets ready for his final attack. | ||||
| | |||||
|
28. Ne5 Rh6 29. gxf4 Rfh8 30. fxg5 Rh6h2+ 31. Kg1 Rh2h1+ 32. Kf2 Rh8h2+ 33. Ke3 Rh2h3+ 34. Nf3 Rxf3+ 35. Rxf3 Qxc1+ 36. Kf2 Qe1+ 37. Kg2 Qg1# |
I think you will agree when I say that this goes to show that a development advantage can lead to an easy game for the player with the advantage aslong as he keeps the intiative. SO to answer the question "is development crucial?" the resounding anwer is yes! I hope you enjoyed my annotation. If you have any feedback or you think I have made any mistakes please PM. Tom | ||||
| 1 comment | |||||
| |||||