|
|
11. Ne2
|
I presume is idea was to play c3 and put a knight on d4. |
2 comments
|
|
|
11... Ng4
|
This is a blunder. I was thinking that he can't take my bishop on f5 as I reply with Nf with check. Of course, after doing the move I realised that that 12. Bxf5 Nf2+ 13. Rxf2 Bxf2 14. Bd3 and white has bishop and knight for rook, and a clear advantage. It was at this point, after I played Ng4, I pressed my clock and realised that my clock had not stopped and was ticking away alongside his. I had to drive a couple of miles back to Malpas to borrow a friend's clock.
|
2 comments
|
|
|
12. Bxf5
|
So he just takes |

|
|
|
12... exf5
|
I take back |

|
|
|
13. Ned4
|
He continues with his plan. |

|
|
|
13... Qb6
|
I hit his knight. |

|
|
|
14. c3
|
He protects it. |

|
|
|
14... O-O-O
|
I castle queen-side. I thought that I have positional weaknesses. My d pawn is isolated, my f pawns are doubled. My only chance is to go for a tactical melee, where positional factors are less important. What is your view dear reader? |
1 comment
|
|
|
15. h3
|
He hits my knight |

|
|
|
15... h5
|
Instead of retreating, I try this. Of course, if he takes the knight, I take back with the h pawn and he loses his Nf3. Unfortunately he doesn't have to take. |

|
|
|
16. b4
|
He throws up his queen-side pawns, which is usually the best course of action if players have castled on opposite sides. |

|
|
|
16... Be7
|
So I retreat my bishop. |

|
|
|
17. a4
|
He advances again |
1 comment
|
|
|
17... f6
|
I hit his centre. |

|
|
|
18. a5
|
He hits my queen. |

|
|
|
18... Qa7
|
Queen retreats |

|
|
|
19. Nxc6
|
He takes my knight, also hitting Qa7 and Rd8. |
1 comment
|
|
|
19... bxc6
|
So I take back. |

|
|
|
20. Nd4
|
He blocks the a7-g1 diagonal again |

|
|
|
20... fxe5
|
I take his central pawn |

|
|
|