I prefer e4 giving the pawn back but allowing simplification and lateral defense along the third rank by the rook.

40. Rc3 was indeed bad, but I think it is 41. Rf1 that loses the game for white. It should have been preceded by Rd3, i.e. 41. Rd3 Qe5 42. Rf1

while true it also violates one of the primary rules of chess namely never move a piece two moves in a row unless it improves your standing. That's why Rc3 was the more costly move. Yes he could play Rd3 but he'd be losing a tempo in the process having just moved the rook off of d3.

This game goes to show how narrow the margin yet how deep the gulf between intermediate and near experts and masters.

One of the most instructive annotations I've ever read. Thank you for sharing.

I heartily agree with damalfi. Thank you.

I agree, too, and as as a participant as well I learned a great deal - many thanks to elyhim!

As someone really just learning chess, participating in this game along with the other club members was more insightful than 40 played games. The discussion we had on the forum really opened my eyes to some fundamental errors I have been making... primarily for me, the importance of patience.

That was a great read and instructive... Thanks Elyhim