In some cases, a pawn is fine on c3 if White advances a pawn to d4. In this case, it's terrible since White eventually moved the pawn to c4 and never prepared for a d4-break (something he should have done before Black moved his queen to d4).

Horrible, horrible move. I would give this two question marks because of its superficiality. White moves his c-pawn twice in the opening, gives Black a chance to attack the rook, and for what -- to annoy the queen?? Oh, come on. 5. Bc4 looks much more solid to me. There is even a little trick in this move: if 5...Qd8?, then 6. Qf3! threatens capturing the bishop at f5, capturing the pawn (and attacking the rook) at b7, and a potential checkmate at f7.

I wouldn't call this moving away. White's horrible pawn moves left a grand opening for you to attack both the rook and f2. What's surprising about this is that if White tries to protect the rook, he gets himself in some real danger anyway: 6. Nc3 Bc5 (threatening mate at f2) 7. Qe2 Be3! forces White to lose his white- squared bishop to avoid checkmate. The move 5...Qd4 took full advantage of White's horrible pawn play on moves 2, 4, and 5, and at this point, Black has won the game.

You failed to mention why White couldn't capture the knight with the queen, as 15. Qxe2 leads to 15...Qxh1. I wonder why White didn't just move his king to h2. True, Black can play 15...Bg1 16. Rxg1 (not 16. Nxg1?? Qxe1) Nxg1 17. Qxg1. White's position looks terrible, but at least he hasn't been checkmated yet.

Psshh, don't be so hard on the guy. He didn't fail to mention, but merely didn't mention.   And this annotation is like some kind of cool story; it's very original for a chess game annotation.  

He didn't mean. He help to understand. He try to do best he can do. He will understand and he can do it.   We encourage and help them understand. We didn't hurt. We just show how to move a right and warning move. We not mean that. Just help him understand clear and how to right move the chess game.