| |||||||||||||
From | Message | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
geniusacamel 15-Jul-14, 10:26 |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
![]() For mine, I would welcome Joe back into this club at any time. But if something comes to light that indicates a different view, I am open to persuasion. If the matter is personally sensitive to one or other of the parties, then perhaps the matter - whatever it is - ought to be placed before Gameknot for adjudication. I do not want to see club members removed for insufficient reason; no more will I object if the case is deserving of such treatment. |
||||||||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||||||
stalhandske 18-Jul-14, 23:42 |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
![]() I have the utmost confidence that Joanne will do what 'is more appropriate. |
||||||||||||
|
![]() This guy seems to just delete any post or thread he doesn't agree with, not to mention removing members he disagrees with. At the very least he should have his status downgraded to member and Joe reinstated in my view! |
||||||||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
![]() I feel sorry for Joe, though at least he will have a kind of proxy connexion for the time being through our present WtW game. I have a selfish reason for regretting what has happened, too. It probably will mean the demise of the Mentor Group I game, as Joe was just about one of the last two or three members participating. That the game has gradually turned against the team probably hasn't encouraged many players' enthusiasm for continuing. There has been no action there for 3 days now. I'll leave it a while, and if nothing further happens, will count it as a Black win, and annotate it as promised. As for geniuscamel, for the moment I am assuming he acted as he thought in a manner appropriate to the circumstances as he saw them. From what I've been reading in this forum so far, no one is imputing any motive on his part other than overzealousness. It seems to me that perhaps for a day or so at least we should wait and see what time will reveal. Cheers, Ion |
||||||||||||
stalhandske 19-Jul-14, 01:38 |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
![]() I think personally you would have to look closely at Joe's Team where he used to be a member and isn't anymore. Did he leave or was he pushed! Food for thought at least. Dave.... |
||||||||||||
stalhandske 19-Jul-14, 01:48 |
![]() gameknot.com gameknot.com @Dave: I do not think that anything that has happened in a Team has relevance with respect to membership in this club. The key is breaking rules of THIS CLUB, or not! |
||||||||||||
|
![]() I was just surmising that it is a possibility that is where the trouble started and nothing to do with our club!! |
||||||||||||
|
![]() Also lets keep profanity out of this, if only to take the moral high ground and to prevent te deletion of criticism being any way justified. |
||||||||||||
|
![]() It is he that should be reported to GK!! Just look at his Stats! has been a member of GK for less than 2 months. played 73 games Won 70 and lost 0! Has a time / move circa 10 mins! Is either super human or has a silicon Brain! I leave it to you to decide.......................... |
||||||||||||
|
![]() Look, I'm not altogether unbiased in this matter, and would rather see Joe reinstated than not. But I have reason to believe this whole gig is now in the hands of Gameknot. Let it be decided there. What I'm looking at is a can of worms that I would be very reluctant myself to go anywhere near. @ dynamic_dv: it may be that more lines have been crossed than would make this a simple matter upon which to adjudicate. Fore instance, the second sentence of your last posting might, to a credulous mind, be regarded as abusive (of a third party), and hence perhaps in transgression of Gameknot's own rules. Now, me, I'm open to treating each situation on its merits, but another might be less ...erm ... generously disposed. Do you take my meaning? One person's minor infraction, barely registering as such, is another's major transgression. The difference is the more noticeable when one happens to be the topic of such abuse. I'm forming the impression that both principals (jkarp and geiusacamel) have overstepped the mark in some degree. It may well be they're not alone in this. My attitude is this. jkarp ought to be reinstated, conditional upon whatever may be found about what has led to this kerfuffle that might redound to his discredit sufficient to justify dismissal. It's the 'innocent until proven guilty' type of thing. But geniusacamel be afforded the same consideration and courtesy: that no further judgement, pronouncement or sentence be made upon him until more comes to light. I won't be altogether surprised if this approach isn't taken: feelings are running high. I imagine mine would be as well in different but similar circumstances. But that does not invalidate my suggestion: keep schtumm... and wait. |
||||||||||||
stalhandske 19-Jul-14, 03:25 |
![]() < I'm forming the impression that both principals (jkarp and geniusacamel) have overstepped the mark in some degree.> I would be interested in knowing on what basis (other than the action by geniusacamel) one can arrive at the impression that jkarp has "overstepped the mark" (meaning, of course, the rules of this club because that is the only relevant matter here). Also, is it not quite obvious that the other party has done so? 1) giving no reasons to club members or fellow moderators for why a member is rejected 2) rejecting that club member repeatedly after other moderators have reinstated him 3) deleting threads/posts by fellow moderators (in at least two instances) |
||||||||||||
|
![]() Well said stalhandske. |
||||||||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||||||
easy19 19-Jul-14, 12:08 |
![]() A club that is based on my idea,s and value,s I got a answer from Joe and i got no response from genius! so this is not in the line of how a player with the master status in this club should behave. - If Jkarp was wrong ore misbehaving at some point that is not the discussion here! Abusing moderator rights with no explanation is! |
||||||||||||
stalhandske 19-Jul-14, 13:18 |
![]() I think this is too much and I do not understand why Jo needs to consult GK in such a crystal clear case. |
||||||||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
![]() Look, my first reaction to this issue - coming into it fairly late with 17 club messages in my IN BOX - was no different from yours. It did seem to be a clear cut case of someone abusing newly obtained responsibility. But the more I looked into this, it just didn't stack up that way - at least, not quite. Am I expected to accept this is simply a case of a person allowing the moderator responsibility to go to his head and come down for no good reason on the first victim that came under his notice? Seriously? Nah... I can't do that, not once I've put some thought into it. Something was said and done, and neither principle is saying (in my view, to the credit of both of them) in this forum. |
||||||||||||
|
![]() If you got something, you got evidence of cheating, you take it to GK. Snide insinuations have no place in this club, and no place on GK. We all know where that can lead. I've taken it upon myself to check out geniusacamel's game history. What do we find? Just 4 games were played against players currently rated above 2000 (one was 1996 at the time). Results: 1 win (a very good one against blacklab) and 3 draws. Very good, but scarcely unprecedented, and who in any case can positively assert his real playing strength? The 'evidence' from geniusacamel's game history looks pretty damned skinny to me! |
||||||||||||
|
![]() I believe Ion might have a point, things might be more complicated than we can see, perhaps if the other systems were in place we would have more ability to judge. Right now we should perhaps not jump to conclusions when we don't know all the facts. |
||||||||||||
archduke_piccolo 19-Jul-14, 16:33 |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||||||
andywm 19-Jul-14, 18:02 |
![]() Regards, andy |
||||||||||||
|
![]() |
||||||||||||
|