| ||||||||||||
From | Message | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
the-jim 14-Sep-17, 15:18 |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
![]() I sent a pm to knightemplar1 letting him know how i felt, he said he was annoyed with goldentweety that's all. and has given me a sincere apology which i have accepted. I do hope he has apologised to apatzer and the_jim as i think he was working with us at the time then we can all get on with running our teams and playing chess. Geoff |
|||||||||||
|
![]() But why all the secrecy? Since it s a good idea why not offer it openly to all teams? The most information I have been able to gather is that it is a plan to save captains time and unnecessary work. The posting of teams implies membership and friendship but it is also a smart way to navigate from team to team when creating challenges. For the benefits, you have to look at 3-4 man matching that is part of the smart challenges. This is a great idea. You need fewer challenges to keep your team busy and if the challenge is offered so that players have the same time per move roughly, the match should finish in approximately the same time as a two man match. In fact I came to the same conclusion after our merger with the UNKNOWN. We started accepting a lot more 3-4 and larger matches in April to keep a balance between the free players and the busy players All in all less work for the captains and that is great. Another possible benefit is that through the passage of time, the higher ranked teams should remain at or near their level because you only lose one rung on the ladder for a loss, but the benefits to lower ranked teams is considerable. We all know that if a lower rung team should win, they will advance halfway to leading team. By securing top level teams in the membership, we are sure to see a rise in the lower ranked teams, and perhaps a general rise in the group as well. In fact for the Crusaders it has happened very quickly, now holding their own at or above the 30 level mark in less than two months. I have not paid attention to the other teams as I have a large team to take care of, and we usually sit in the top ten. As a large team it is easy to accept open challenges and it is easy to respond to challenges. Not all of our players are busy and we have quite a few matches on the go. I do congratulate knightemplar~1 on his success so far, but the Knights Templar will not be playing the Crusaders without an apology. I wish him luck on both the ladder and the table as he states on his home page that they will be a permanent fixture in the top 10 of both the ladder and the table. Good luck and congrqatulations |
|||||||||||
the-jim 22-Oct-17, 15:05 |
![]() It appears that they "the Fighting Warriors" started this Smart Challenge. |
|||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
the-jim 22-Oct-17, 15:12 |
![]() It appears that they are in the smart- challenge, but it looks as if they started it That's how it comes across to me. |
|||||||||||
|
![]() " We are calling this project "Smart Challenges". I think Smart Challenge was the initial idea of knightemplar_1. Perhaps Fighting Warriors will correct me if I am wrong. |
|||||||||||
the-jim 22-Oct-17, 15:35 |
![]() the fighting warriors worded the smart challenge; it appears that it is something which they started. If you look how the smart challenge is listed on other team home pages it is clear that it was not started by that individual team, but it is not so clear on the FW team page. |
|||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
the-jim 22-Oct-17, 16:18 |
![]() |
|||||||||||
the-jim 22-Oct-17, 17:12 |
![]() So there that's the end of that! Lol |
|||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
the-jim 22-Oct-17, 17:22 |
![]() Jerry was also at the FW |
|||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
the-jim 22-Oct-17, 17:27 |
![]() |
|||||||||||
the-jim 22-Oct-17, 18:55 |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
![]() Today I looked at his extended chart, which is what you are probably curious about. He has an enormous drop in his chart in 2008. What really got my attention is that his current chart only shows 12 timeouts. Curious. He resigned most of those games shown in his huge drop in the extended chart. When I tried to pick out a big drop in timeouts, I couldn't find one. I did count 6 in a row, so I assume that his 12 timeouts is correct. He didn't play for 5 years from 2008 until 2014. From his chart and past game history, his chess skills now seem a little better than 2008. I see he has recently played team games against Kings of the Castle, so this is where he attracted your attention. Whatever caused him to resign all those games in 2008 and not play on GameKnot for five years, who can tell, except himself, of course. |
|||||||||||
the-jim 23-Oct-17, 12:36 |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
![]() Hello, sad_but_true, Hey ... Could you past this from me on the club page.. We are not part of the Smart Challenge Group !! Don't agree with it and never will. From Bearz2 ... THE DUTCH TEAM. I would like all captains to remove us from the list. |
|||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
![]() |
|||||||||||
amacivn 04-Aug-19, 16:37 |
![]() |
|||||||||||
amacivn 05-Aug-19, 03:16 |
![]() |
|||||||||||
|
![]() "Hey, Guys, DUTCH TEAM has been removed from the elite SMART CHALLENGES consortium effective July 2019. Get that? " My question is: Is the Smart Challenges consortium really ELITE? I don't think so. |
|||||||||||
|
![]() knightemplar-1 has been removed from this club. My I suggest we stop talking about him please. |
|||||||||||
|
![]() I cannot think you would be happy with what he said ? Just a question , no offence I'm wondering about the next person he attacks , you could just ignore what is said about your er..... acquaintance (?) , Or ask the person who was insulted and attacked twice , let Shirley decide ... I - 1000% support her , and you could ignore this thread , or let it fade away , I sorta get the impression that he will crop up again ... they usually do Anyway no offence , to you anyway .. Regards Neil |
|||||||||||
|
![]() Thank you for asking. I actually meant in the future, (going forward) I did not mean the current post's as everyone has a right to defend themselves. I would rather him fade into obscurity. The more we collectively feed trolls. The more we feed into their egos. Also the chances of someone coming here to respond on his behalf. Is increased. If we keep speaking of him. As he is now unable to directly defend himself. Because he is banned from here. |
|||||||||||
|