From | Message | ||
---|---|---|---|
|
![]() at least one deleted thread. Most of us will occasionally delete a post because we cannot edit the post. But what about posts deleted by moderators? Where do we draw the line? All comments are welcome. |
||
|
![]() |
||
|
![]() |
||
|
![]() I do know though that whether action is taken or not should be based on both Gameknot's rules and policies, as well as the preferences of the one who is in charge, which in this case, is JJ, king_0_nothing. Like the captain of a team, he's, how you could say, is the captain of this club, so if he leaves extra guidelines, they should be followed. I agree with what he's done and is still trying to do so that everyone can have a good time in this club. If someone doesn't, well, they don't have to stay of course. |
||
|
![]() |
||
|
![]() With that, you can edit, split, merge and move threads. It has all sorts of other great features too. This forum software is severely limiting. There might be a thread created as a type of discarded posts bin for deleted posts. The moderator could copy and paste a deleted post into this thread, editing as needed, with a citation of where it came from and why it was deleted and moved. And then delete the original post with a following post pointing to the relocated post. In this way, editing is possible. In this way the post is not actually deleted, but is moved into a thread where a more thorough explanation is given as to why it was removed. In this way, the censorship issue is skirted. |
||
|
![]() by keeping it locked. Mods can unlock when posting and then relock. |
||
|
![]() And I definitely like those ideas Classica. Whether Gameknot will ever decide to implement them one day is to be seen. |
||
|
![]() |
||
|
![]() |
||
shirlmygirl 06-Dec-20, 10:49 |
![]() |
||
shirlmygirl 06-Dec-20, 10:53 |
![]() |
||
|
![]() Nothing of the kind. Please read it again. I did, and am flummoxed at how you could have reached this conclusion. While not all your posts WERE worth saving, just about the only content on that thread that WAS worth anything (including my own posts) was written by you. As I recall. In other words, I thought you had some good content on that thread. If you have one fault it must be being over sensitive. I had not remotely implied anything negative about you, and again have no idea how you wrangled that conclusion out of what I wrote. Granted, Lord Shiva is often given to sarcasm and irony. That absolutely was not the case here. |
||
|
![]() Shirlmygirl's posts were perfectly innocuous. Completely innocent. I just didn't want anyone to misinterpret them the way I was misinterpreted so as to reopen old wounds. |
||
shirlmygirl 06-Dec-20, 16:11 |
![]() |
||
|
![]() Whether everyone has had their say or not, I'd just as soon this be the last word on this subject. Does anyone have fun photos of cats? |
||
|
![]() I really didn't misinterpret you, lord_shiva. When I read it again, I realized that. I apologize for posting that. To anyone who reads this, I did not say anything unpleasant about Lord-Shiva in my deleted posts. Too bad he felt he had to delete them. [Last part deleted as being unnecessarily antagonistic]. |