Play online chess!

Pages:  « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next »
From	Message
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 21:32	Limbaugh is fantastic, I probably get to catch is program an average of 20 minutes per day. But the conspiracy was revealed by the wikileaks emails like two years ago. I don't care whether or not you are motivated by an interest in the truth.
stalhandske 25-Jan-18, 21:37	Winslow OK, I read that letter. "Juicy story"  . Quite human reactions though, although some are not so pretty. Yet, the actual fact is that Director Comey made a decision based on all data he had. According to US Law the distinction between "crime" and "no crime" is hair thin in cases such as this when there is no "intent", and a matter of wording. Comey chose "no crime". I am not taking a personal stand about whether he was right or wrong - it was his objective decision. I tend to favour it, however (from the little I know), not least because apparently a few others high up in the US government had also in the past overlooked e-mail security in much the same way. It was a human mistake - stupid, may be, but not one sufficient to incarcerate the person.
mo-oneandmore 25-Jan-18, 21:37	The argument favoring this forum subject appears to be some crazily inspirational blindness thrown against a wall by idiots and, of course: Morons.
stalhandske 25-Jan-18, 21:41	Winslow I am 100% sure that we are all interested in the truth. After all, that is the key of this very Club. <But, look more deeply into the Donald Jr meeting. Who did he meet with?> Now, you are suddenly changing subject again - I had responded on the earlier issue. Why can we not handle one thisng at a time?
mo-oneandmore 25-Jan-18, 21:44	"I really don't want to spend the time trying to convince people who despise Trump with every ounce of their being. But, look more deeply into the Donald Jr meeting. Who did he meet with? " Which one of many wild, crazy, scary and weird Trump meetings are you referring to? Trump Jr. merely arranged for a meeting with Russian Intelligence to learn how the Kremlin might be able to disrupt our democratic election process to favor Trump. Or: Do you prefer to argue that meeting was about adopting Russian children?
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 21:44	Is that why you usually sign off as "Mo?" Stalh, I'll give you some specific examples about the Comey train-wreck tomorrow. For tonight, I will dream of Trump's magnificent performance in Davos. i.redd.it
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 21:46	Stalh, I was only responding to one thing that had been brought up. I'd be happy to go through them one at a time but it will take quite a while.
stalhandske 25-Jan-18, 21:47	<Stalh, I'll give you some specific examples about the Comey train-wreck tomorrow.> That's another diversion! We discussed a specific matter and you disregarded the replies and went into another matter. Please, focus on what is being discussed. Otherwise none of this makes any sense.
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 21:48	Jan, I know just how to get you to disappear from this conversation. "Trump Jr. merely arranged for a meeting with Russian Intelligence " Who was it? I'm asking because it matters.
mo-oneandmore 25-Jan-18, 21:49	hightower "Is that why you usually sign off as "Mo?"" Not quite hightower --- you apparently don't read many forums here. "examples about the Comey train-wreck tomorrow." I can't wait for that nut case story!
stalhandske 25-Jan-18, 21:50	Winslow Now, you do have time to argue about the NEXT matter, leaving the earlier one ignored. I very much dislike such tactics - and I want to say so right now.
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 21:50	Stalh, I posted the original comments with the video, which covers multiple topics. I thought I was going to address your concerns with Comey because that seemed like what you wanted to me a moment ago. Please, pick your topic. I'll tell you everything I know with all the evidence I have.
stalhandske 25-Jan-18, 21:53	<I thought I was going to address your concerns with Comey because that seemed like what you wanted to me a moment ago.> Perhaps we better say YOUR concerns about Comey! You have now changed the subject, which is OK by itself, but kills just about all of the logic of the previous discussion.
mo-oneandmore 25-Jan-18, 21:55	winslow " I posted the original comments with the vide" All you post is arguments --- how-about some proof, truth or even logical evidence to back-up your story?
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 21:55	I'm asking you very clearly which topic you want me to address. Which topic do you want me to address?
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 22:01	The way this is going we are going to need a new thread for every topic. And there are a LOT of them. I'd be happy to take one at a time
stalhandske 25-Jan-18, 22:03	Winslow <I'm asking you very clearly which topic you want me to address. Which topic do you want me to address?> You switch the responsibility on me. We started with a certain theme, which you explained after my query, but then - without responding to my replies - you switched to yet another conspiration topic - about "the Donald Jr meeting". This is extremely confusing, not only to me but to the majority of Fiat Lux Members. Which is why I would like to deal with/discuss one issue at a time!
mo-oneandmore 25-Jan-18, 22:04	winslow "I'm asking you very clearly which topic you want me to address. Which topic do you want me to address?" How about your conspiracy theory about a "conspiracy to clear Hillary Clinton of any wrongdoing and frame Trump for Russian collusion"? That IS the subject of you're forum, isn't it?
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 22:08	I pointed out some theories that exist, and I said we will find out if they were true. But the grand conspiracy covers many many topics, including Comey and all of the other things you said I was sidestepping. Would you like me to start with the exoneration of Hillary or the framing of Trump?
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 22:10	I think janheckman might have added some static to the discussion so that I didn't quite get the right message from you.
stalhandske 25-Jan-18, 22:14	<But the grand conspiracy covers many many topics, including Comey and all of the other things you said I was sidestepping. > Don't bring the discussion back to its beginning! We discussed the Comey "problem", from which you got out by switching to some Donald J Trump Jr meeting. This "conspiracy thread" is of course yours, but as the Club founder I want it to follow concise rules. We were discussing the "Comey problem", so I want us to continue on that issue alone! Until it is resolved. Or, start a new thread on "some Donald J Trump Jr meeting".
mo-oneandmore 25-Jan-18, 22:15	winslow "I pointed out some theories that exist, and I said we will find out if they were true." I can answer that that question for ya: They're all fiction. Next question please?
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 22:16	I just said I would tell you everything I knew about the Comey "matter" and you made me believe I was speaking about the wrong topic.
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 22:18	I'm just saying, when I correctly guessed the Comey one was the topic you wanted me to address you should have said "yes, that one" instead of your quip about how it was "my concern." You confused me. I'll give you Comey. But tomorrow. This clarification has wasted too much time tonight. I have a job, you know!
stalhandske 25-Jan-18, 22:20	<I just said I would tell you everything I knew about the Comey "matter" and you made me believe I was speaking about the wrong topic.> Where and when did I do that? Now, this is (again) a serious accusation that I will not tolerate. So, please let me know exactly where "I made you believe you were speaking about the wrong topic"! NOW!
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 22:22	winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 21:50 [ delete ] Stalh, I posted the original comments with the video, which covers multiple topics. I thought I was going to address your concerns with Comey because that seemed like what you wanted to me a moment ago. Please, pick your topic. I'll tell you everything I know with all the evidence I have. stalhandske 25-Jan-18, 21:53 [ report abuse ] <I thought I was going to address your concerns with Comey because that seemed like what you wanted to me a moment ago.> Perhaps we better say YOUR concerns about Comey! You have now changed the subject, which is OK by itself, but kills just about all of the logic of the previous discussion.
stalhandske 25-Jan-18, 22:25	<you made me believe I was speaking about the wrong topic.> When? That is ridiculous. We have discussed the Comey topic all the way until you departed from it.
mo-oneandmore 25-Jan-18, 22:26	stalh "Where and when did I do that?" Why don't YOU find it??? It's apparently something disruptive that I said during the past hour or so.
winslowhightower 25-Jan-18, 22:27	It's right there. I told you I would give you everything I had but I needed to go to sleep. You said the concerns with Comey were mine and that made it sound, to me, like you had no concerns with Comey. Really, whatever happens, tomorrow I will spend an hour and give you everything I know about Comey. Goodnight.
stalhandske 25-Jan-18, 22:28	Winslow <you made me believe I was speaking about the wrong topic> You made this statement - stand by it! You changed topics - which I did not like. Agree?
Pages:  « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next »

GameKnot: play chess online, chess clubs, Internet chess league, monthly chess tournaments, chess teams, online chess puzzles, free online chess games database and more.