chess online
« TAP TO LOG IN

Play online chess!

Our new world respect
« Back to club forum
Pages: 1234
Go to the last post
FromMessage
softaire
16-Nov-21, 10:35

Our new world respect
Here is a sampling of our new world respect and esteem now that Trump is gone.

www.youtube.com

mo-oneandmore
16-Nov-21, 14:08

Laughing about Biden's stuttering problem again to argue dementia, huh softee? That's a trumpist for ya.

Talk about World respect: China passed USA in gross product during trump's presidency.
Thjat's right: USA is now # two thanks to trump's isolationist Make America Great Again "Plan", but he forgot to tell ya that America was already great until he came along.
softaire
16-Nov-21, 14:42

LOL... that is NOT a stuttering problem.
And, if China has a bigger GDP, it is because the Dems have outsourced all the jobs to China.
Jobs were coming back to the USA under Trump.
thumper
16-Nov-21, 17:01

Claiming that Biden has a 'stuttering problem' is a lie and you know it. Do you really think people are so stupid? Are you? People at large aren't psychological professionals put everyone has grandparents and great grandparents and see what's going on.
stalhandske
16-Nov-21, 19:36

<LOL... that is NOT a stuttering problem. >

<Claiming that Biden has a 'stuttering problem' is a lie and you know it.>

I see, so we have TWO professionals here, who has given their diagnosis! Yet, the historical FACT is that he has/had a serious stuttering problem. It was 'worked off' with great efforts, but due to its nature the basics of such a problem never 'leaves the brain' but often enough shows its ugly head back again when the individual ages.

Shame on you two!
softaire
16-Nov-21, 20:22

And this from someone who cannot even interpret the news fairly or comprehend what is happening at our Southern Border. You have NO legitimacy in making comments about any of this.
stalhandske
16-Nov-21, 20:36

Well, the reply shows the quality. It addresses the problems of the southern US border but responds to a comment about president Biden's stuttering problem.

Duhh!
thumper
16-Nov-21, 21:17

Stål
<Yet, the historical FACT is that he has/had a serious stuttering problem.>
That's not true. That was a recent think tank concocted 'explanation/excuse' to cover for Biden's cognitive decline.

You can try to spin what you like but I've been aware of and watched Biden for 50 years. How about you?
stalhandske
16-Nov-21, 21:28

Thumper
Have it your way, and disregard all the data from his youth! That just fits your agenda very well, not to care about facts! You may have 'watched Biden for 50 years', but your eyes have been shut about some of the facts concerning his health. Typical of someone who disregards facts that 'don't fit', such as age determination of archeological specimens (which you still haven't responded to despite promises), or facts about covid vaccinations.

I have absolutely nothing against your choice of life style. I actually admire it! And wish I could do the same, but in practise I can only do that now in the summer period.
pawntificator
17-Nov-21, 01:56

Data from his youth?

Ha ha, please entice me to start posting clips of Biden in his "youth" because that would be hilarious.

youtu.be
lord_shiva
08-Jan-22, 03:28

Fox Business News
Private Sector job growth blows past expectations.

Putin now has someone competent standing up to him. He sure misses his fat little puppet.

China is miffed the US has not severed relations with Lithuania, which recognizes Taiwan instead of Tapei.

But otherwise, US international relations have improved considerably since the former guy departed back to Maralago. No longer is the president praising and mimicking despots.
pawntificator
09-Jan-22, 01:35

media.patriots.win
pawntificator
09-Jan-22, 01:38

I cannot accept evil. Set your mind and decide where you stand. I will not accept evil. Now make your statements understanding that I will not accept evil.

lord_shiva
09-Jan-22, 08:29

Embracing Evil
Your defense of all things Groper highlights how you've sold your soul to Satan for thirty shekels of silver. What throws most conservatives is that they pay the thirty shekels instead of receiving them. They pay Satan to harvest their souls, and somehow walk away feeling they got a bargain.

"I sure rooked Satan in that transaction, yeehaw! So relieved of my soul and thirty shekels. So unburdened, MAGA!"
pawntificator
09-Jan-22, 09:31

I do regret sending 30 bucks to Bernie
dmaestro
10-Jan-22, 13:49

Not as much as those who supported Bernie while you played closet Trumper before “coming out” regret ever taking you seriously.  
pawntificator
11-Jan-22, 01:53

You don't seem to realize how stupid I was. I was legitimately a leftists Bernie supporter. You might want to paint me as a closet Trumper the whole time, but I just wasn't paying attention.
stalhandske
14-Jan-22, 21:15

Biden's speech impediment
is what started this thread before it was taken over. Here is an objective article about this issue

niemanreports.org
dmaestro
14-Jan-22, 22:09

Nothing
www.politico.com

For the record You were always a low contentiousness person and addicted to conspiracies which didn’t fit. Bernieism was naive for these times and I told you that back then. Trumpism was a much better fit; and fake news your forte.

The claims Biden is senile and not a stutter are classic right wing lies but that is normal. Biden’s difficulty with speech and bully pulpit is contributing to his decline. He’s really too old for today’s divided America but nobody else could have beaten Trump.
thumper
14-Jan-22, 22:17

I'm not an MD with a Geriatric Specialty but my wife does work in that field and I've spent years hanging out in the Extended Care facility interacting with and spending a lot of time with the residents there. I've seen many come and go. Some were good friends.  Another tell-tale sign of his decline is how he walks. Very telling. His mental and physical frailties go hand-in-hand. This is the cycle of life.

I've spent an entire professional career reading verbal and physical cues so don't piss on my leg and try to convince me it's raining. Pay closer attention and you may pick up on the cues but you're more than welcome to circle the wagons and repeate the party line as you wish.
stalhandske
14-Jan-22, 22:34

Thumper
<I've spent an entire professional career reading verbal and physical cues so don't piss on my leg and try to convince me it's raining.>

I have no further comment, and no interest in discussions at that level. I was just referring to facts, such as his fight against stuttering, which was blankly denied in this thread.
dmaestro
14-Jan-22, 22:37

The question was does he have a lifelong stutter which affects verbal skills not is he getting old?

I’ve seen many still sharp leaders walking that way once they turn 70.

Until you actually are a geriatric speech specialist I’d say that reading body language to diagnose diseases isn’t definitive. Even as brilliant as you think you misapplying skills to other fields.

www.axios.com.

There are simpler reasons why Biden failed. You can’t herd cats so you don’t overpromise and Biden’s communications are not good but it’s Dems jobs to help him and instead they are self destructing.
thumper
14-Jan-22, 23:20

DM
Back in the day Biden was a serious bullshitter. He could 'manufacture' facts on the fly and at the drop of a hat. We see the decline right in front of us today. This isn't rocket science. This is normal and nothing to be ashamed of, we all get there. The people who are despicably using him are the ones who should be ashamed.

<Biden’s communications are not good but it’s Dems jobs to help him and instead they are self destructing.>
I agree. I don't believe any of these 'failures' are Biden's fault and don't hold him responsible. They're rightfully layed at his handlers' feet. Those who shamlessly use him for their own agenda are responsible. At some point there will be an accounting.
stalhandske
14-Jan-22, 23:35

<Back in the day Biden was a serious bullshitter. He could 'manufacture' facts on the fly and at the drop of a hat.>

Those are very hard words, and - again - without a shred of backing. Speaking of 'manufacturing' facts.......
thumper
14-Jan-22, 23:41

Stål
Do a little research then get back to me.
stalhandske
15-Jan-22, 00:14

Thumper
Old trick. I already posted an objective analysis, and won't go into your game. You made serious assertions; it is up to you to provide the backing for them!
thumper
15-Jan-22, 00:45

Stål
If you don't know Biden's history and are unwilling to do a bit of research that's on you. It's not my responsibility to take the time and effort to try and educate you. Your constant demand to, "Prove to me" gets old. That itself is an old tactic.
stalhandske
15-Jan-22, 01:59

Thumper
Sorry, but you have the principle backwards. It is YOUR responsibility to back up your claims by relevant facts, not mine. That is basic procedure, and there is no tactics involved whatsoever on my side. It is part of unwritten courtesy rules in discussions among educated people, and I am susprised that it has not caught your attention. I am pretty sure, however, that in your past important work as Inspector, you had to back up your assessments by fact.
softaire
15-Jan-22, 07:45

We don't know what we don't know.

It's common for each of us to be unaware of some things. We may have an image, or a belief, or simply a "feeling" about some thing and yet still be unaware of other information about it. In fact, I'd say that was the most common situation.

Still, with our limited information, we can still support our beliefs with what we have and know about it. But we should NOT rule out another persons' statement about it simply because we happen to be unaware of the information that brought that person to their belief and statement(s).

stalhandske
15-Jan-22, 08:06

Softaire
<Still, with our limited information, we can still support our beliefs with what we have and know about it. But we should NOT rule out another persons' statement about it simply because we happen to be unaware of the information that brought that person to their belief and statement(s).>

I completely agree with this! All I'd like to know - then - is precisely the 'information that brought that person to their belief and statement(s).' Only then am I capable of assessing the dependability of this information. This is all I have been asking for.
Pages: 1234
Go to the last post



GameKnot: play chess online, Internet chess league, online chess puzzles, monthly chess tournaments, chess teams, chess clubs, free online chess games database and more.