Play online chess!

From	Message
coram_deo 31-Oct-21, 13:21	Why Evolutionists Behave The Way They Do (A similar version of this post was posted in another thread, but I think it deserves its own thread.) One thing I recently learned about evolutionists is why they’re so shameless in how they behave - the lying, the insults, the harassment, the hate … they have no problem with it! And the reason they have no problem with it is because they think they descended from animals and therefore their only accountability is to the herd. Anyone who is viewed as an opponent of the herd must be attacked - and attacked again and again - by any means necessary. Nothing is off limits when it comes to protecting the herd. It’s an incredibly primitive - and pretty alarming - mindset, but that’s where it comes from. That’s why you’ll see one evolutionist saying “Good post. I agree” so often. It’s their way of reinforcing the preservation and sanctity of the herd. On a broad scale, it’s why communist governments feel no remorse in murdering millions of human beings who are dissidents in their own countries. The dissidents are viewed as threats to the herd and must be eliminated. Now the folks in the FIAT LUX III herd view the founder (quite naturally) as the leader of the herd and usually defer to him in all matters and take their direction from him. The moderators are below the status of the founder in the herd hierarchy but are above regular herd members. That’s why being a moderator is viewed with such importance and why one fellow who doesn’t know who or what God is or what he believes was so desperate to obtain the moderator position. It elevated him in the herd heirarchy. You may notice when an interloper is spotted, the herd often engages in “dog pile” behavior where several herd members will attack the interloper at the same time in an attempt to drive him off or wound him. It’s not unlike cheetahs going after a moose. That is why the herd leader keeps suggesting I leave GameKnot. The herd can’t wound me ‘cause I’m wearing the armor of God but doesn’t feel comfortable with a non-herd member in their presence. So the most recent development (a proposal that came from a moderator) is to ignore the interloper (i.e. me.) This was tried in the past but failed because it goes against all instincts the herd has for its protection. Let’s see if they can do it this time.
coram_deo 15-Nov-21, 10:59	The herd way of thinking in action! Today (or possibly yesterday; I didn’t check the time stamp) an atheist and evolutionist (I repeat myself) posted a bad idea by a former member of the Trump administration and then subscribed that bad idea to everyone who supports the former president. Leave politics out of it ‘cause the politics aren’t relevant here - the herd thinking is. To the atheist/evolutionist who wrote that post, the former member of the Trump administration is a high-ranking member of the “Trump herd” and because all members of a herd must conform their thoughts, opinions and beliefs to the herd elite, *all* supporters of Trump must agree with that bad idea and therefore *all* supporters of Trump hate the U.S. Constitution. See how this works? There’s no room for independent thoughts or disagreement in a herd. If a herd leader says something, all herd members must fall in line, and if they don’t agree with the bad idea initially, they better come around. There is no room for dissent in a herd! Evolutionists use this herd thinking to smear entire groups of people if one perceived leader of that group does something wrong. Humans (imo) are hard-wired to believe in something greater than themselves. For believers, that “something” is God. For atheists/evolutionists, that something is the herd - not unlike what primitive tribes believed - and the herd is usually identified as a political party. “What herd do you belong to?” the atheist/evolutionist will often wonder when meeting someone new. “Are you friend or foe?” “Must I place my hand on my javelin, or can I leave my hand by my side?” And atheists/evolutionists don’t need to know your position on all issues (or even many issues) - usually the political party you’re a member of is enough to identify you as friend or foe. Because atheists/evolutionists think all members of a political party (herd) must believe all positions of that party (herd,) identifying the political party you belong to immediately identifies you to the atheist/evolutionist, who thinks he knows everything about you based on that information. Again, no room for independent thinking. No room for thinking at all. You did all your thinking when you picked your herd. After that, the herd hierarchy takes over. To the atheist/evolutionist, you are a member of a herd and you agree with the herd leaders on all matters. Good post. I agree.
coram_deo 17-Nov-21, 10:28	Another example of herd thinking in action: <<Isn’t a jail term for what he did deterrent for others doing the sane? Isn't a slap on the wrist tacitly supporting this type of vigilantism? You want to foist responsibility on society to change while advocating actions sure to increase the actions you deplore!>> This evolutionist thinks Kyle Rittenhouse should get a jail term to prevent others in his “herd” from behaving the way he did. I haven’t followed the Rittenhouse case, except for occasionally reading posts in threads about it on here, but the punishment (if any) Rittenhouse receives should be based *solely* on his actions and not as a deterrent to other members of his “herd” doing what he did. But to evolutionists, Rittenhouse is a member of a herd - not an individual - and therefore the consequences of his actions must be viewed and decided in terms of his herd and not just him. “If we’re going to keep this herd of baboons in line,” the evolutionist reasons, “we must make an example of this baboon so the other baboons get the message!” Of course, if Rittenhouse were in the same herd as the evolutionist who wrote the above excerpted post and Rittenhouse had attended a riot of evangelical conservatives and killed two of them, this evolutionist would be screaming, “Self defense!” To the evolutionist, individuals don’t exist. Only herds do. That’s why evolutionists’ morals and standards shift like sand - to them, members of their herd are always right and must always be defended, while members of the opposing herd are always wrong and must always be attacked. That’s also why this evolutionist thinks humanity is a cancer on the planet and should be eliminated. He doesn’t see individuals. He sees herds. And I would wager dollars to doughnuts that he doesn’t really think *all* of humanity should be eliminated; just the people he doesn’t like - the people who aren’t in his herd.

GameKnot: play chess online, monthly chess tournaments, online chess puzzles, Internet chess league, chess teams, chess clubs, free online chess games database and more.