chess online
« TAP TO LOG IN

Play online chess!

God and Science
« Back to club forum
Pages: 123
Go to the last post
FromMessage
lord_shiva
18-May-25, 14:10

Blowhole II
So why are basilosaurid blowholes intermediate between Pakicetus and modern whales?

No basilosaurids exist today, and none existed back when Pakicetus and Ambulocetus first appeared. So why in God’s blue sea are there these incredible transitional forms?

Let me just say once again—if I wanted man to reject evolution I would have hardly created all these amazing transitional forms species. And I absolutely would not have fashioned monkeys or fossil hominids. Nor would men even be synapsids, however much else of mammalian anatomy I might lazily copy. I mean, why give evolutionary biologists all the best evidence, while squatting on creationists and excreting coprolites? Even coprolites delight paleontologists.
victoriasas
18-May-25, 14:42

<<Though to be fair Vic’s offerings have been less than adequate, outside of his comments on Trump—on which we tend to be in good agreement.>>

You falsely claimed weeks or months ago that my objections to molecules-to-man evolution were based on religion when in fact none of them have been.

So you’ll understand my reluctance to waste my time replying to you.

I will go over your document dump on whale evolution and if I see anything that comes close to rebutting what was in the whale evolution videos I posted, I’ll post a reply.

But I’m hardly optimistic given how you misrepresented the complexity and interdependence of the whale’s reproductive system.
victoriasas
18-May-25, 14:46

<<I mean, why give evolutionary biologists all the best evidence…>>

What evidence? An unknown number of alleged transitional fossils and similar genomes?

And how do Darwinists explain the vast gulf between the capabilities and accomplishments of humans vs. the most advanced animal?
lord_shiva
18-May-25, 23:13

Explain the Difference
<< how do Darwinists explain the vast gulf between the capabilities and accomplishments of humans vs. the most advanced animal?>>

Why should they? Technology ain’t biology.

Place a human in a field naked and afraid and they are generally dead inside twelve weeks. Native Americans did way better back before Europeans destroyed their culture, MAGA.

Salmon swim faster. Bears rip unarmed humans into hair ribbons. Dogs outrace us. Release a cat in the wild and it will be fine months later, unless it runs into a coyote or dog. Bunnies outrace us procreate us…
bobspringett
18-May-25, 23:19

Vic 14:46
<What evidence? An unknown number of alleged transitional fossils and similar genomes?>

Yeah, THAT evidence.
lord_shiva
19-May-25, 18:42

Bob 23:19
<< Yeah, THAT evidence.>>

 . Yeah, I had the same thought. Definitely worth pointing out. My trouble is whenever faced with a fork in the road I inevitably choose the narrow, rutted, pothole filled uphill path with tight switchbacks, instead of the straight, paved, level path that leads to the same destination in a fraction of the distance. Some kind of character flaw, I reckon. “Reckon I best add these heavy rocks to my pack before I set out.”

apatzer
19-May-25, 20:19

"When you come to a fork in the road. Take it." ~Yogi Berra
Pages: 123
Go to the last post



GameKnot: play chess online, free online chess games database, monthly chess tournaments, Internet chess league, chess teams, chess clubs, online chess puzzles and more.