Play online chess!

From	Message
euro_pop_legend 02-Jun-23, 12:24	Early opening Q exchanges.Good,bad,indifferent? That has always been an issue of thought and it really boils down to the strength of your opponent.The theory is that early exchange against a stronger opponent of yours will be to the advantage of the lesser rated player,for his opponents "big Q weapon"is off the board(before castling like in the example below...white has to recapture with his King,which then prevents normal castling.To some extent that "theory"holds true,but in more realities it DOES NOT!Most of the time,if your opponent is rated 100 points or more above you,his tactical strengths in either a closed position or his positional strengths in an open position will more than compensate.My view is that,say two players...one being 1500 and the other 1800 or 1900,it is best to NOT exchange Q's early.The Queen may very well be needed to defend against a strong positional attack by that nasty 1900 player!If the ratings are about equal on both sides,then early exchange with the King exposed temporarily on an open e file has theoretical advantage.But,in most GM games,you rarely see early Q exchanges.Q's on both sides are needed "insurance"for both white and black,especially if you have a masters rating or above. If not,I still do NOT suggest eraly Q exchanges,that is UNTIL your rating is high enough to take the "heat"of slow death retaliation from the other side. 1.e4,e5 2.f3,c6 3.d4,Nf6 4.c3,d6 5.dxe5,dxe5 6.c4,Qxe1 7.Qxd1,Kxd1 Taking away your opponent's right to castle is generally most useful if you can build up a strong attack on the King. But my rule of thumb is to never exchange Queens or other major pieces unless I am up 3 or 4 points in pawn value(or more).Like a Knight and a Pawn or perhaps 3 pawns.If my opponent does this to me as a 2300-2500 player(rare)then there is some concern with my K on the open file,so I must have a good upcoming tactical strategy to compensate,which usually occurs with a stronger central control with my pawns.In blitz,for me,it actiually happens quite frequently when my 1400 to 1800 opponent feels that getting "rid"of my Q early will equalize for him and be a safer move.Not so!Both my tactical and positional strength usually outweigh his,so a bit loss of tempo with preventing me from castling usually does not work.In those cases,many times I just engaged "artificial castling"soon after!
euro_pop_legend 02-Jun-23, 12:45	Later in the game with a far open position,equal Q exchanges are ok but only IF the position is very equal= on both of those sides.But that depends upon the plan of white or black.Again,I tend to not exchange Queens and even RETREAT my Queen(with loss of tempo)if I feel that my opponent has the initiative or even a one pawn advantage on me.That Q can easily bring back that pawn loss later in the game!This is where post computer analysis of that game PROVES many times that a one pawn,or even a two pawn advantage is an "illusion of advantage"!For the exact present position may dictate that,but 8 moves later,that Q of mine can either capture back those pawns or create a strong counterattack.So,its up to the player. But in any case,I see early Q movement from move #3 and beyond from players south of 1500 in rating.That is commonplace!Those early fools mates do not work much anymore these days...if you have noticed? I see that all the time in blitz! When my opponent drives his Q early into my war zone,he is just shoved back and I may or may not exchange Q's early.But only AFTER my positions have advanced,with much more central control due to his blunder of moving his lady out too early! Man,sometimes I do not move my Q until move 20 or more!Sometimes I do not Castle until move 25 or more!But that is me,not the player who needs to learn more of the basics before doing circus stunts like me!

GameKnot: play chess online, monthly chess tournaments, Internet chess league, chess teams, chess clubs, online chess puzzles, free online chess games database and more.