chess online
« TAP TO LOG IN

Play online chess!

God vs Evolution
« Back to club forum
FromMessage
bobmoore49
27-Feb-09, 14:25

God vs Evolution
I used the title God vs Evolution, because many believers in god, have a difficult time believing in evolution. To make any sense of this is very hard for me, because there isn't any evidence for the existence of a god, yet there is a mountain of evidence for evolution. I guess that's why you have to have faith to believe things that aren't true.
tanta
12-Mar-09, 16:44

GOD VS EVOLUTION
there is ample evidence to show for the existance of god.
the first is, just reach inside your wallet; that is god.
the second, what you consume.
there are many many more.
the term you should have used is GOD.
there are three that are used, god-God-GOD.
sacsandviolence
30-Apr-09, 21:28

Deleted by sacsandviolence on 08-May-09, 05:50.
sacsandviolence
03-May-09, 07:00

nouns, Nouns and NOUNS
Tanta has asked me to post this again. It seems he's lost it.

I understand the difference between an ordinary noun which refers to any member of a category, and a capitalized proper noun which refers to a particular individual. However the use of all capital letters is not standard, or wasn't when I studied English. I question your use of god, God and GOD. My understanding is that 'god' refers to any superhuman or divine being, usually invisible, and prayed to and sacrificed to by most human cultures. The proper noun, God, is used to denote that particular god (usually the Supreme one) which the speaker/writer believes actually exists. Pray tell, what do you mean with the triply capitalized GOD?

By the way, I looked inside my wallet and saw no invisible super-creatures there. No gods, angels, demons, sprites or pixies. Just George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. And they're not very talkative.
tanta
03-May-09, 13:11

Deleted by tanta on 03-May-09, 13:14.
tanta
03-May-09, 13:23

nouns, Nouns, and NOUNS
This issue is about a person whom touts facts that he cannot support. Or I should say does
not want to support as they would destroy is belief about that which he does not understand.
The start, islamic and christain GOD the same, yes as the facts put forth. This person
refuses to accept the facts that are plain to understand. I believe this person has a hatred
for islamic believers of the KORAN.
For this person it is an insult to have ALA and the "I AM THAT I AM" in the same breath even
though they are one in the same. As far as the three concepts, in the pentateuch, there are
references to a confrontation between MOSES and some other priests; the other threw down
some staffs and they tuned into snakes so MOSES threw down the STAFF and it also became
a snake witch ate all the other snakes. Now these priest believed in some gods-Gods but
there’s was not GOD. (are you able to extrapolate).
1st Sphere - Seraphim, Cheribum and Thrones
2nd Sphere - Dominions, Virtues and Powers
3rd Sphere - Principalities, Archangels and Angels
From our position these are Gods thru and thru. but not the "I AM THAT I AM"
For this discussion the God of the bible is Baal
Now you would not place Baal and I AM THAT I AM side by side now would you, ahhh but you
do not believe only in George Washington and Abe Lincoln.
They do talk[b***sh** walks]
tanta
07-May-09, 12:49

noun Nouns NOUNS
AGAIN SILENCE



GameKnot: play chess online, Internet chess league, online chess puzzles, monthly chess tournaments, chess teams, chess clubs, free online chess games database and more.