|
|
| From | Message |
|---|
bobbynox
18-Sep-06, 21:16
|
The ancient history I alluded to was the fact that it was Soviet Russia that was in that fight, and 'they' don't even exist anymore. Bringing the 'russians' into this argument is the same sort of non-seqitor as the media uses when they compare iraq to veit nam. again ancient history.
We are winning in afghanistan. They are free. They have schools. They have farms. They even have drugs (so i am told).
|
soulcrates
18-Sep-06, 21:21
|
 They don't even exist anymore. |
|
A couple of points
If you had read my prior comment, you would recognize that I was simply remarking that thereare plenty ofreasons one might choose to attack the secretary. I Just felt like your comments about her teeth among other things, was a crass attempt to tear her of down.Your reluctance to accept that fact toeveryone else but me is odd. I find your attempt to equate your bad behavior to her performance The most revealing ': in essence your point seems to be that if anyone either makes a mistake or does something wrong, you retain the right to demean them in any way you want you want to. you recognize your own "crime" but it is a fair tactic to demean her appearance, in any fashion you want because she isn't from your political persuasion
why don't you just say I hate her politics, think she's evilI thinks she is liar ; etc....but to attack her appearance was a poor decision; instead of attacking me.
|
leo_london
19-Sep-06, 01:35
|
I think we need to lighten up a little. Put any group of male chauvanist pigs together talking about a woman and her appearance/bedability will come up. Its crass, yes.
However, does anyone remember some of the comments made about Thatcher ?...from members of her own cabinet and overseas dignitaries ?...she was not above using her sexuality, fluttering her eyelashes and using her charm.
Also, I wonder how many women have privately, among friends, discussed the physical " attractions " or otherwise of some of our leading male politicians. Its not meant to be serious, just part of what makes the world go round, watercooler talk.
|
|
Leo.....
Ahh Margeret Thatcher....... I cant begin to understand any guy finding her attractive though many
commented on her charms..... Are you in a position to enlighten me?
|
leo_london
19-Sep-06, 04:18
|
Not me, I posted that after breakfast, didnt even want to entertain the thought before.
Here we go again, more crass, sexist posts. I must go and say a few hail Mary's. or in this case hail Margaret's.
|
saintinsanity
19-Sep-06, 05:56
|
watercooler talk
It always comes back to the same thing. Did you see that game? Boy, those are some crazy politics. I wonder if Bush has the power to push the button. You know, I think I really like vanilla.
No, chocolate sucks, I don't want to hear it....Oh yeah? Yeah!!! YEAH???
Among the older ladies, I was very attracted to Patty Duke as a young lad. Also, I once had a dream about Mona, from "Who's the Boss"
Anyhow, I think it is darned right we should demand the truth! Who was the mastermind who started the title of this thread?
|
soulcrates
19-Sep-06, 08:26
|
Mona? I mean, when I was growing up I had a crush on
Allysa Milano from Who's the Boss, not Mona!! That's like having a fantasy dream about the Golden Girls. Not that they're from a different political party, but they're old. That would work if you were old too, but you're my age Pawn, and that's just a perversion. Ask Billy Madison on his nudie magazine day.
Dok, again I don't feel sorry for making fun of Condoleeza Rice. She brought it on herself, I am only the messenger. Perhaps I dug too deep to find the reasoning that she would have to lie to the American people, and that is what I came up with. Call it a crime, but nobody died. Unlike her crime. I don't feel sorry for making fun of clearly evil people.
|
|
Soul
I'd quit while I was ahead if I were you.
|
saintinsanity
19-Sep-06, 13:39
|
Hey!
I didn't say I had a crush on Mona! It was just one dream! AHH!!!!!
|
soulcrates
19-Sep-06, 14:39
|
lol! Let's ask Sigmund Freud.
I'm sure he would have said differently! Ah well, her permiscuous personality is what caught your attention, so I only blame your subconscious for getting confused. It's like when people sleep at nude beaches, and the sundial thing. I wouldn't know, but I could figure.
|
saintinsanity
19-Sep-06, 14:41
|
Whatever dude
You know Mona was hot. You can go to the nude beach all you want, you are still gonna get sand in your crack, no matter what time it is.
|
saintinsanity
19-Sep-06, 14:42
|
By the way
I do not wish to have sex with my mother.
|
soulcrates
19-Sep-06, 14:45
|
Oedipus.
That's terrible tragedy. Terrible. Those darn Greeks and their incest. Speaking of incest I saw this video yesterday, and it really opened my eyes to the New World Order thing happening. Here it is if you haven't heard about it yet.
video.google.com" target="_blank">-> video.google.com
I hope it works, it's about a woman named, "Cathy O'Brien and an ex-CIA member named Mark Phillips." It is questionable, but very intriguing. Let me know what you think.
|
saintinsanity
19-Sep-06, 17:43
|
I think it was too long
and that guy talked too slowly, said too many words, and didn't say anything of meaning at all in the first 10 minutes, so I had to turn it off.
|
soulcrates
19-Sep-06, 17:45
|
Yes, I had to skim thru it to get the jist.
The most important part is the woman. She's the only known child who has escaped this evil ring. You're right though, he was long winded. I mean, get to the point. The problem with that, is that the point is very sharp, and if thrust into the crowd, most would have left. It needed to be explained and circumvented to outline the actions, before blowing the minds of the viewers with actual name dropping, and events.
|
saintinsanity
19-Sep-06, 17:50
|
Well
I guarantee nobody is going to watch that video. Its two hours long! Well, maybe one or two of the crazy people will watch the whole thing. But for the rest of us, we need a summary. Who is controlling minds? Who's minds are they controlling? How are they controlling them? How does this affect me? What can I do? Et cetera.
|
soulcrates
19-Sep-06, 17:56
|
Knowledge they say is the only way to defend yourself.
The woman also says at the end, and you'll enjoy this pawn, "I am not pro-marijuana, but I am anti-anti-marijuana." She says this because she explains that smoking marijuana opens up paths in your brain that other drugs do not. Because of this people who have created other pathways are not as succeptible to mind control. Therefore this is the reason that the U.S. government spends more on anti-marijuana than on cocaine, crack, and heroine. Which she says this mind control uses to spread those drugs. The woman said she was both a political sex slave, and a mind controlled drug mule. She explains that she was controlled because she was a multi-generation abused child who did not know right from wrong, and was picked up by the CIA thru a child pornography ring, that they created. They also say Timothy McVeigh was one of these children. You really should take a look at it. There is more, but I don't want to ruin the suprise.
|
|
|
