|
« TAP TO LOG IN
|
Play online chess!
Current stories the MSM avoids
« Back to club forum| From | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
 Current stories the MSM avoidsPoll: Scott Brown Leads Elizabeth Warren by 4 in Massachusetts Senate Race Obama Campaign Scrambles to Kill Illegal Online Fundraising Story by Wynton Hall Obama Campaign Lashes Out With 'Big Bird' Attack by John Nolte Study: Nearly Half of Washington State's Jobs from China by Warner Todd Huston Calif. Gov Takes Action as Gas Prices Keep Rising Schweizer, Bannon Expose Vulnerabilities in Online Campaign Fundraising Romney: 'Hope Is Not A Strategy' Newsweek: GAI Report Reveals Obama's 'Illegal-Donor Loophole' Alexander Marlow Iowa Poll: 68% Support Photo ID Law Nevada Voter Fraud Law Upheld, ACORN Conviction Sustained Daily Kos Poll: Romney Leads by 2, Big Gains with Women, Independents Gasoline Prices Still Climbing in Calif. Obama Campaign Lashes Out With 'Big Bird' Attack Poll: Scott Brown Leads Elizabeth Warren by 4 in Massachusetts Senate Race New America Foundation: Another 'Non-Partisan' Group Goes Hard Left...Again Report: Nearly Half of Congress Vulnerable to Fraudulent, Foreign Online Donation Obama.com Owner Part of U.S. Delegation on Biden's 2011 China Trip Bombshell Report Sparks International Flood of Tips on Foreign Online Donations Pew: Romney Takes 4 Point Lead, Beats Obama on Favorability Study: Nearly Half of Washington State's Jobs from China www.breitbart.com |
||
|
stories breitbart avoids |
||
|
seriously thumper save it for the body politic, where like minded individuals can cogratulate themselves and pat themselves on the back for how smart they are. |
||
|
i second then motion..... |
||
|
|
||
|
i do not discussus or debate anymore with |
||
|
|
||
|
chaz let's talk about romney's 'hope is not a strategy.' he says that, but then it appears his entire campaign is based on 'trust me.' doesn't anyone else see the irony? |
||
|
z ... |
||
|
if a sources of info are tainted |
||
|
chaz5 PS; They care only for what they are told to care about. |
||
|
dmaestro 09-Oct-12, 10:37 |
|
||
|
bc ... |
||
|
bc who do you want to be? and what are the bars by which you measure yourself? is it your goal to counterbalance right wing extremism with left wing zealotry? "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." Martin Luther King, Jr. sometimes in fighting against extremism, we can become that which we are fighting if we are not careful. look at gw bush and don dumsfeld - in fighting terrorism, they resorted to torture, making them that which they purported to be fighting. |
||
|
i will discuss based on facts 'ONLY' "All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing" EB |
||
|
|
||
|
you speak of a moral equivilency |
||
|
it is ironic Breitbart.com's Love-Hate-Love-Hate Relationship With CNN Polls Blog ››› September 11, 2012 10:43 AM EDT ››› SIMON MALOY 37 Polling is a tricky business. It's an inexact science predicated on extrapolating broad trends from small populations. The safest way to approach polls is to treat them as what they are: snapshots of a moment in time taken from a specific angle. The worst way to handle them is to do what Breitbart.com is doing with CNN's polls: treating them either as the unvarnished truth or a pernicious liberal conspiracy depending entirely on President Obama's numbers. On June 1, CNN released a poll showing that the presidential race had tightened from the previous month, and Breitbart.com's John Sexton called it "bad news for the president." More bad news for the President arrives today in the form of a new CNN poll. The poll, conducted May 29-31, shows the race for President has tightened significantly over the last month. If the election were held today, 49% would vote for Obama and 46% for Romney, which is within the poll's margin of error. Last month CNN's poll showed the President with a 9-point advantage (52-43%). The high water mark for the President has been 54% in CNN's March poll. On August 9, CNN released a poll showing Obama with a seven-point lead over Mitt Romney among registered voters, and Breitbart.com's Mike Flynn alleged "CNN Is Just Making Up Poll Numbers Now." Okay, I'm not certain they are literally making up poll results, but the poll CNN and British market research firm ORC International released Thursday afternoon is so screwy and raises so many questions that they might as well be doing it intentionally. If CNN is already resorting to these kinds of tricks before the conventions have even started, it's going to be a very long campaign. Almost a month later, on September 4, CNN released a poll showing that Romney's favorability numbers improved following the Republican National Convention. A month after accusing CNN of "making up poll numbers," Flynn touted the new CNN poll's numbers: I know the media is telling us that Romney didn't receive a bounce in the polls after the RNC convention last week. Yet, a new poll released last night by CNN suggests otherwise. 53% of likely voters now have a favorable impression of Romney, against 43% who view him unfavorably. Before the convention, Romney's favorables were 50/46. This is a six-point improvement in his favorables. In other words, a bounce. And just yesterday, CNN released its poll showing a large post-convention bounce for Obama, and Flynn was back to alleging that CNN is cooking its numbers, asking: "Did CNN Rig Its Own Poll?" CNN is grabbing political headlines tonight with the release of its latest poll. It shows Obama surging to a 6-point lead over Romney, 52-46, among likely. Before the start of the Democrat convention, the candidates had been tied in the poll. Since it purportedly confirms a narrative the media is trying to build, i.e. that Obama is starting to pull away with the race, it is getting wide coverage. However, there are a couple of strange things within the poll that cast doubt on its veracity. And, at least one concern warrants a response from CNN. This isn't a new phenomenon. Conservative bloggers routinely accuse pollsters of being liberal shills who purposefully distort their numbers to help out Democrats -- a serious accusation that they toss out with alarming ease and little justification. But the funny thing about polls is that they change, and all those accusations of misconduct and bias suddenly evaporate once the numbers shift in their preferred candidates' direction. |
||
|
Z And i say 'GOOD'. It appears to me that there is an outright attempt by a 'few' to steal our Democracy from right under us. The stakes are far to high to play 'sandbox' and act reasonable. It is a social 'WAR'. There will be a winner and a loser. And my rights and my future children's rights are at stake. The War is against Corporate interests not against right-wing zombies on this forum. The War is taking place around the levers of power. I am a combatant in this War. I will give no quarter nor ask for any. And there is no 'moral equivalency', that people seem to think exists. After this election i will return to my other interests gladly.Till then i don't care what you or chaz or anyone on either side thinks of me. You seem to forget that i started out on this forum with reasonable,non-partisan,respectful posts backed up by thoroughly accredited sources of information. You saw what the zombies said AND DID about that.I was attacked and labeled a Liberal(as if that was bad) and worse. So now i have girded myself for Battle.And i will see it through to the end. With great respect.... BC. PS; nothing i have said is untrue. What Thumper and the other 'guys' have said and say 'is' untrue.But even if you 'demonstrate its truth or falsehood,they will not believe you!!! |
||
|
z |
||
|
|
||
|
softy |
||
|
extremist me? softaire; if you don't post your talking points anymore because of me, then i guess i have succeeded somewhat in toning down the falsehoods. |
||
|
the GOP seems to think |
