Play online chess!

Pages:  1 2 3 4 Next »
From	Message
thearrtofnoise 30-Dec-16, 14:36	Disappearance of Clinton Foundation CEO Eric Braverman 'The Mysterious Disappearance of Former Clinton Foundation CEO Eric Braverman' As the FBI continues its widespread investigation into the foundation, Braverman's vanishing act has the internet wondering and the mainstream media curiously disinterested. By Rachel Alexander Published on December 29, 2016 • 16 Comments Rachel Alexander Eric Braverman, the Clinton Foundation CEO from 2013 until 2015, has apparently been missing since October. His absence has fueled speculations in the blogosphere but so far has been ignored by the media. Some speculate, with good reason, that Braverman may have gone into hiding after an email mentioning his name was released by Wikileaks on October 22 of this year. In the March 2015 email exchange, Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden told Clinton campaign manager and confidant John Podesta there was a mole within the Clinton Foundation. Podesta in his reply told Tanden the mole was Braverman. Braverman had abruptly resigned from the Clinton Foundation shortly before this email exchange took place. And then, after the email exchange was made public by Wikileaks, Braverman vanished from the public eye. This seems like a story that someone might want to report. The last evidence of Braverman’s public activity was October 12, when he posted his last tweet on Twitter. (Usually he tweets about once a month. His “husband,” Neil Brown, hasn’t tweeted since August, although he rarely tweets.) I left a voicemail on Braverman’s personal phone and sent him an email, but received no response. He is still listed as a lecturer at Yale University and, contrary to some reports, there is a record of his lectures going back several years. I contacted the press office and Braverman’s department at Yale and received no response. Braverman, the Podesta Leaks and the Clinton Foundation Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, told The Daily Mail that Podesta’s emails were leaked to the organization by a disgruntled insider, not the Russians. Consequently, there are suspicions it may have been Braverman. (Though some of the Podesta emails are dated after Braverman’s tenure with the foundation, if he had Podesta’s password, he could still have accessed his email after leaving.) ----------------------------------------------- Re: Tweet from @JoeNBC From:ntanden@americanprogress.org To: john.podesta@gmail.com Date: 2015-03-08 19:48 Subject: Re: Tweet from @JoeNBC Holy Moses. Sent from my iPhone> On Mar 8, 2015, at 5:23 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote: > > Eric Braverman > > JP > –Sent from my iPad– > john.podesta@gmail.com > For scheduling: eryn.sepp@gmail.com > >> On Mar 8, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Neera Tanden <ntanden@americanprogress.org> wrote: >> >> @JoeNBC: A source close to the Clintons tell @ron_fournier to “follow the money” and find the real HRC scandal. t.co >> >> I’m hoping someone is keeping tabs on Doug Band. Quote in here is from someone who worked in Clinton Foundation. -----------------------------------------------
thearrtofnoise 30-Dec-16, 14:37	Continued So far Braverman’s apparent disappearance has only been discussed by bloggers and fringe websites, which often mix the fact that he has gone silent with other unconfirmed claims. For instance, the site WhatDoesItMean.com reported that Braverman requested asylum in Russia on October 23. The information apparently came from a Russian blogger, who reported it in a rambling blog post on LiveLeak. That’s pretty thin evidence. Moreover, WhatDoesItMean.com is known for posting questionable news stories. The left-leaning, myth-debunking site Snopes labeled the news site’s account of Braverman as false, but based its judgment on the fact that website publishes false stories. Aside from this circular argument, Snopes provides no independent evidence for its judgment. I contacted the Russian embassy and received no response. So at the moment, the claim that Braverman requested asylum from the Russians is an unconfirmed rumor. #Where’sEric: Could Braverman be in FBI Protective Custody? There are also rumors that Braverman is in FBI protective custody, perhaps in exchange for testifying against the Clintons. Sources within the FBI have said it is likely there will be indictments handed down over the Clinton Foundation’s pay-to-play schemes. Senior FBI officials told CNN that the investigation into the Clinton Foundation had never ended and is still ongoing. According to The Daily Caller News Foundation, that probe now involves as many as five FBI bureaus across the country: New York, Little Rock, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and Miami. Would the FBI have hustled Braverman to safety once it was known Podesta had pegged him as a mole? This theory seems plausible, given what we know. But there is still no independent evidence of it. All Questions, No Answers If Braverman is in hiding to protect his life, is it because he leaked the Podesta emails to Wikileaks, and/or is he preparing to testify against the Clintons? The one thing we know is that Braverman has disappeared from the public eye, and that neither he, his “husband” Neil Brown, nor his family, nor his Yale employers, has made a single public statement to dispel the speculations. NOTE: The hashtag #WheresEric has been started on Twitter. Follow Rachel on Twitter at Rach_IC.
thearrtofnoise 30-Dec-16, 14:44	It's Watergate on Steroids Braverman could know everything about PizzaGate and SpiritCooking. The Clinton Foundation was doing a lot more than just moving money like the Mafia. If alive, he could incriminate all of the powerful elite. Lies, deception, corruption - and something Satanic ... www.youtube.com Published on Dec 27, 2016 by C. Ervana Just a few months before its destruction, GAWKER leaked embarrassing information about Hillary and her control of the Main Stream Media (MSM). This was long before Wikileaks began exposing Hillary's cozy relationship with the MSM. If you aren't familiar with the website Gawker, it was involved in leaking, exposing, and outing powerful elites, celebrities, and politicians. It became famous for outing Peter Thiel, a billionaire tech tycoon, as a homosexual. The online gossip website posted at least two articles about Hillary Clinton, that her aides were writing articles for Politico's "Playbook," which is a blog that tracks the political elites of Washington D.C.; Hillary's aides were also writing content for the Atlantic, a highly respected magazine with a large circulation. The Atlantic later endorsed Hillary for president, just the third time in history the magazine has taken such a step. So Gawker caught Hillary commanding the MSM. They carried out her agenda, they obeyed her, and did as they were told. This is what the MSM is all about. They are the "fake news," putting Hillary's agenda over reporting facts. Now, the MSM and Hillary are accusing alternative news of being "fake." Why are they doing this? Because they lost, big time. Not only did they lose the White House, but they also lost their credibility and their reputations. Alternative news has grown very popular; Some larger Youtube alt-media channels are now outpacing major news networks like CNN, MSNBC, and ABC in average viewers. The MSM and Hillary are calling for alternative media to be censored because of the growth. Eric Schmidt, Mark Zuckerberg, and other tech executives have responded accordingly. They all know, the future of media DOES NOT belong to the MSM. The people of Europe, America, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand ARE SICK of the MSM, telling them to accept George Soros' migrants, to speak political correctness, to accept open borders and globalism, and that they are "racist" and "kkk members" if they voted or supported Trump. Hillary made assertions that Trump supporters were racist, sexist, and involved with the kkk back in August 2016, at a green screen speech she delivered in Reno, Nevada. Since, the election, all we've heard are talking points pulled directly out of Hillary's Reno, Nevada speech. Key words like "conspiracy theories" "disturbing" "kkk" "racist" "Steven Bannon" "Alex Jones" "Dog Whistles" "Alt Right" and "Russian Propaganda" have been repeated in the American, Canadian, and European Press so much that it sounds like it came directly from a memo sent by Hillary. This wouldn't be surprising at all; at least 10 MSM sources were caught producing headlines with the same key words after the Republican Convention concluded in the summer 2016. The MSM has previously been exposed in numerous Wikileaks as working for Hillary Clinton. One Wikileak showed the Hillary hosted 65 hosts and anchors from almost every MSM network, and another Wikileaks showed that Clinton aides hosted an event for the purpose of "framing HRC and framing the race." This event occurred just two days before Hillary announced her run for president. The word "framing" seems to suggest that the media was colluding strongly with Hillary's campaign. Not surprisingly, attendees to this event included Glenn Thrush, George Stephanoplous, and Alex Wagner, all of whom displayed a reporting bias in support of Hillary Clinton. But Wikileaks WAS NOT the first source to expose Hillary's cozy relationship with the MSM. Gawker came first, and look at what happened to them!! Certainly, there were other factors in Gawker's demise, but 2015-2016 was a period of enormous growth for the gossip website. They were averaging 30 million hits per month, and rapidly growing. This makes me wonder, was Gawker's takedown intentional? While the one allegedly behind the takedown, Peter Thiel, is a Trump supporter, remember that Thiel also sits on the board of Facebook and has been silent as Facebook plans an extraordinary amount of censorship of alleged "fake news," which is nothing more than an attack on alt-media. Why is Thiel so quiet when it was alt-media who got Donald Trump elected? I am not saying that Hillary was the reason for Gawker's demise; I am stating that Gawker exposed numerous powerful elites within political, economic, media, and Hollywood circles and that is why, I believe, it was destroyed.
jonheck 31-Dec-16, 02:16	noise Thanks for the twisted conspiracy theories. Before I could comment further I would need a good reason to read them. Jon
mo-oneandmore 31-Dec-16, 04:37	jon No further need for my planned comment, brother.
mo-oneandmore 31-Dec-16, 09:30	Deleted by mo-oneandmore on 31-Dec-16, 12:58.
ace-of-aces 31-Dec-16, 10:54	Curiosity can kill a cat. youtu.be youtu.be youtu.be There are also rumors that Braverman is in FBI protective custody, perhaps in exchange for testifying against the Clintons. Sources within the FBI have said it is likely there will be indictments handed down over the Clinton Foundation’s pay-to-play schemes. Senior FBI officials told CNN that the investigation into the Clinton Foundation had never ended and is still ongoing. According to The Daily Caller News Foundation, that probe now involves as many as five FBI bureaus across the country: New York, Little Rock, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and Miami. ================ This reminds me of Clintons' whitewater real estate scam. Their lawyer Foster knew all their illegal dealings. So, his death was ruled as suicide, some believed he was murdered to keep his mouth shut. That is, dead man will not tell the tale. The same fate can befallen on Braverman who needs FBI protection. I want to know the final result. HRC should not worry if she is convicted because Trump may pardon him.
mo-oneandmore 31-Dec-16, 11:07	ace Nice conspiracy theories and the "I don't remember" song was funny, I suppose. The 9/11 stories are more creative though --- especially the ones about the Clintons doing it.
thearrtofnoise 01-Jan-17, 05:39	Good morning, Liberals. Happy New Year, see you on Inauguration Day. When the government has the Clinton Foundation under investigation, it's NOT a conspiracy, or a theory. It's reality. I believe Hillary pissed off the INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY and THEY HACKED INTO HER SERVER. She never lost the Election because of the Russians. She lost because Donald Trump defeated her. And Braverman is no doubt not a "missing person" but under the Federal Witness Protection Program. His family did not report him missing. He is the key to everything. What a score!
jonheck 01-Jan-17, 05:53	noise Goof grief, good night, sleep long and tight, far rightie.
thearrtofnoise 01-Jan-17, 06:00	It's 2017 Dude, your Left-Right paradigm does not sell tickets anymore. We are in an Illuminati construct. Time for you to wake up and realize what's actually going on. Living in your little bubble will not save you.
jonheck 01-Jan-17, 06:16	noise Sleep on Noise, and continue to observe the world through your closed eyes.
dmaestro 01-Jan-17, 07:52	She did not lose the popular vote, she just didn't do well among the poorly educated who don't understand why they lost out on the American dream. The Russians brilliantly realized they could exploit the divisions in this country because the right wing does not care about fact only what they want to believe. Extreme righty masses are being played like puppets by their masters which is obvious to the aware. Let's see how much damage you can do with your tyranny of the minority before enough people wake up.
mo-oneandmore 01-Jan-17, 07:55	dm Thank's for chimin in friend --- didn't think you would bother Happy New Year to you and yours, and have a great retirement.
dmaestro 01-Jan-17, 14:06	I will...Trump won't affect me much at this stage. Karma is a bitch as they say. What you don't learn you must repeat. Those who refuse to learn will have the worst fate. 25 years of Clinton conspiracy nonsense repeated over and over like the big lie finally took its toll. But now that the Clintons are gone it's time to move on. You see here how the righties real agenda is demonization and destruction of the left. Next time we can't allow the right wingers to spew this vile stuff year after year against the target they fear most without more immediate consequences. Yes it's delusional but after time people start believing it and just saying it's nonsense isn't enough.
softaire 01-Jan-17, 14:15	dm You are now calling for the rejection of the 1st Amendment here. You have called for the violent overthrow of conservatives and Republicans in the past. That is now our government. Sounds like Khrushchev and Stalinist Communism to me.
dmaestro 01-Jan-17, 14:28	No free speech does mean noting can be done about outright lies. Any legally possible action should be taken against these purveyors of malicious garbage. The left is more intellectual and finds this stuff nonsense and not worth the time of day. We need to realize there is a low information dumbed down population out there that falls for this stuff and you have to fight fire with fire with fire. Ever since the end of the fairness doctrine the left has been demonized and lied about and the big lie has become accepted in low information circles. Admittedly I don't get my news from that cesspool swamp but many do. Numerous studies have shown we lose not because our ideas are not better but because the right frames theirs better to less educated crowd.
dmaestro 01-Jan-17, 14:42	www.google.com The reason why liberals can't get their majority mobilizes and better ideas carried out is well known softaire. It's just not in our nature to think that way, and it's easy to dismiss those who do, but we are in a war of ideas. We have to change our approach and take the attacks seriously. Trump would have been defeated had liberals understood what seemed nonsense to us would not be seen that way by less educated people and had they done more to show why Trump will fail.
saintinsanity 01-Jan-17, 16:29	I just can't understand how they were so stupid to think a Clinton was a good idea. So stupid. Ha ha!
brigadecommander 01-Jan-17, 16:54	I just can't understand how they were so stupid to think a Trump was a good idea. So stupid. Ha ha!.
ace-of-aces 01-Jan-17, 17:13	Whitewater real estate scam versus Housing market bubble crash. youtu.be The two are similar. Banks enticed lending money to unqualified people for mortgage. This is called predatory lending. People will borrow easy money to buy homes that they cannot afford. They believed that the house price would always go up and sold at a profit later. This is not so. The home owners could not pay the mortgages and the house prices fell. Housing bubble busted. Tax payers became victims because the government bailed out the banks. There were no perpetrators who got caught on this scam including Clintons. Clintons' scam preceded the housing market bubble crash and I wonder, they invented it.
ace-of-aces 01-Jan-17, 17:44	Trust in FBI that it is doing a good job, investigating any wrong doing of the Clinton foundation. Nobody should be above the law. What is little known by people is about the Trump foundation which is similar to charitable Clinton foundation. Trump is trying to shut it down because of conflict of interest. Similar to Clinton foundation he can be accused of " Pay to Play" if he continues to operate his foundation when he becomes president. FBI intervened not to shut down the Trump foundation until their investigation is complete. FBI suspects that Trump was using the foundation money for his personal business or political activity. The case clearly demonstrates that FBI is not biased against HRC. Trump has multiple law suits in his business. He was also accused of fraud by students of his Trump University which could not produce top notch entrepreneurs that he promised. He had to compensate and settle millions of dollars. Consider the situation. If HRC becomes president instead of Trump, it will be very difficult for the FBI to investigate the Clinton foundation of any wrong doing. HRC can thrash him. FBI chief, Comey was blamed by democrats for Hillary's lost for presidential bid when he investigated her emails. I hope Comey can do a better job this time.
lord_shiva 01-Jan-17, 18:01	Lies What liberals fail to understand is tht we now occupy a post factual world. Truth and reality are utterly irrelevant. So why do we not learn to adopt these conservative tactics? For example, it is well known Groper sexually molests dead babies in Satanic rituals in the basement of Comet Ping Pong, on odd numbered days so as not to run into Hillary. Groper also has a fake birth certificate. His real certificate reveals he was born in Kenya and declares his faith to be Muslim. Groper has also had three wives, cheating on the first with the second and on the second with the third, then on the third with a variety of married women and beauty pagent participants.
saintinsanity 01-Jan-17, 18:06	You're being very helpful. Good job.
brigadecommander 01-Jan-17, 18:22	stuff like this..... ''I just can't understand how they were so stupid to think a Clinton was a good idea. So stupid. Ha Ha'' After going at it Ad nauseam for 6-months. This pure Trollish provocation may be tolerated here. But it will not be in fiat lux. Just another insulting remark aimed at people who voted for HRC. And to think, this troll said he would stop this crap!!!. Ha Ha
saintinsanity 01-Jan-17, 18:25	I was responding to dmaestro. The insult is for the DNC. People who voted for Hillary didn't have much of a choice.
brigadecommander 01-Jan-17, 18:30	BULL I don't buy it. You seek to provoke. I work for the DNC remember?. And proud of it. And we had plenty of choices.We chose the best. So have your fun, defecate here all you want.But don't bring it over by me Mr.
saintinsanity 01-Jan-17, 18:44	If you worked for the DNC you should have heeded my advice. I tried to warn you but you turned away from it. You don't care what the average american thinks. You actively told me to vote for Trump. I'm sure you were helping a cause you believed in and had no actual ability or power to influence the choices of your organization. But Clinton was a bad pick. The answer was Bernie. Bernie.
stalhandske 01-Jan-17, 21:27	sainty I don't know how many times one needs to point out that as good as Bernie Sanders was(is) he did not have ANY chances to win the election. So, a democrat with some sense of reality would obviously choose Ms. Clinton over Sanders. But your sense of reality is failing also about this issue.
softaire 01-Jan-17, 22:46	Anyone who believed in Bernie did so out of a righteous, reasonable position. Anyone who believed in Hillary also did so out of a righteous, reasonable position (even if it was later found to be that the system was rigged in her favor). So, that is politics. The electorate has spoken. They chose who they want by the rules, which favor states rights over a big, national referendum. Follow the Constitution, be glad we have it, and protect it. It'll be your turn... sooner or later.
Pages:  1 2 3 4 Next »

GameKnot: play chess online, online chess puzzles, Internet chess league, monthly chess tournaments, chess teams, chess clubs, free online chess games database and more.