From | Message | ||
---|---|---|---|
grege79 21-Mar-11, 13:24 |
![]() |
||
|
![]() |
||
|
![]() Even with Chernobyl, it's doubtful that Nuclear energy has year-to-year matched the death and destruction of fossil energy production. Fusion talk needs a breather, because it may never be possible. At best, it's far into the future. |
||
|
![]() |
||
grege79 22-Mar-11, 00:51 |
![]() en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org 2040 is some time away, and undoubtably there will be delays, but 2040 is only 30 years in to the future. I would comfortably predict commercial fusion within 50 years, not on a large scale, but moving forward after that it will be a swift transition. Though it does remind me of a story by E.E. Doc Smith, I think it was his final book in the Lensman series, it was in regards to fusion power and some safety issues surrounding it. All sci-fi, but was still a good read. |
||
grege79 22-Mar-11, 01:00 |
![]() www.wind-works.org The fission stats state they are the lowest. I don't know about the reliability of the source, but I bet that fission is about to launch a media blitz. Not directly, but get ready for a lot of positive pieces.. But justifiably in my mind. |
||
|
![]() Distance has an inverse square effect on dose, so a dose of 400mSv at the site (which was quoted by all the media outlets) reduces to harmless doses quite quickly. ''I think there will be a kneejerk reaction to it, and politicians like to be popular.'' This really worries me. The public will be influenced by the media to fear nuclear power, and the politicians will not be brave enough to refuse. |
||
mo-oneandmore 22-Mar-11, 06:26 |
![]() |
||
mo-oneandmore 22-Mar-11, 06:28 |
![]() |
||
|
![]() The problem is that the people will hear a sensational story instead of a "not-interesting" story about the over-all dangers or relative safety of Nuclear power generation. We will be told about the dangers of "eating a piece of rod" rather than hear about the lives of those who live 30 or so miles from the reactor; and then the politico's will "grab-on" to grow their own agenda. |