|
| ||||||||||||||||

| From | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
mkchess 25-Jan-21, 05:01 » Report abuse |
|||
|
kingdawar 25-Jan-21, 06:15 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
|
mkchess 25-Jan-21, 08:07 » Report abuse |
kingdawarThis is not the case here. Thanks! |
||
» Report abuse |
Very easy but nice!I like the idea of en passant captures being involved in solutions but, mkchess, there would be only one such capture possible in the given position. Black could not have played d5 from d7 because of the position of the white N and if it were possible (if the N stood on a6) exd6 e.p. would be mate in one. But I like how your mind works! |
||
|
hagrids_beard 05-Apr-22, 07:08 |
Comment deleted on 06-Jun-23, 05:32
|
||
|
big-dags 05-Apr-22, 16:37 » Report abuse |
mkchess |
||
» Report abuse |
Proving that En Passant is nearly impossible ...A brilliant example for this is a "Dawson's Christmas Tree" puzzle, albeit an upside down version, which you can find in the link below including the solution: www.chess.com |
||
|
snailmate 08-May-23, 01:44 » Report abuse |
big-dagsProblems with an en passant solution tend to have a particular look about them. You get white pawn, black pawn and white king lined up together on the 5th rank. The king is there to negate the possibility that the black pawn moved from the 6th rank, therefore it must have moved from the 7th. There may be other ways to have a provable en passant position, but I can't think of any; they would probably involve having to look back further than one move to give the proof. That inverted Christmas tree problem is very nice. I think I would have immediately seen that it required an en passant capture, but I doubt I would have figured out why only one of the two possible captures was the correct solution. |
||
» Report abuse |
I did like this. |
||
|
Comment deleted on 08-May-23, 15:29
|
||
» Report abuse |
Re: Occulus comment |
||
» Report abuse |
current puzzel |
||
|
snailmate 09-May-23, 02:00 |
Comment deleted on 09-May-23, 02:00
|
||
|
snailmate 09-May-23, 02:00 » Report abuse |
@martian3 |
Account required
Please log in to post comments.
|
After 1. exf6 e.p. or 1. exd6 e.p. the only black move is 1. ... e6-e5 and then 2. Qxd5 is mate.
So we have 2 more solutions for this.
If we try use option <<another solution>> the program don't accept the e.p. moves as kegal, but they are in this positionm acording the usual rules about chess problems.
(I am not interested in a discussion about "how fair" are the rules for chess problems, this is just a technical observation about the problem).