I am here to present tactical problems to real chess players in the midst of a pressing real game position while others present prize winning impossible chess positions. I am here to present live real game chess problems and when the moves get above 8 moves I pay attention to assure all who play real chess the value of SEQUENCE of moves in the TACTICAL WAY.

The rest of the chess problems listed on THIS list are concoctions by computers.

Kindly and simply honestly stated.

My father taught me chess and he was LOGICAL and not PUZZLING things out for awards to "the best puzzle for First or Second or Third Prize.

People who arrange chess pieces to fit THEIR problem are not why I solve CHESS PUZZLES in the TACTICAL ONLY area. Anybody can use a computer to MAKE a problem. Anybody can play here and use THEIR computer to win.

But I play honestly. The first rule of chess: Honor Your Opponent.

Who's honoring who on this site with HONESTY in their own ability over time?

Challenge the big whigs here to see if THEY actually earned their over 2000 points rating and look again at Tactical Chess established HERE to see what honest ratings actually exist.

And be aware there is a guy who claims I am blitzkov and HE supposedly knows how to continue printing chess problems when he is absolutely incapable of playing a game with me or anyone below his assigned and false rating.

Memorandum to the network on this Site of Gameknot.

From: John or Menlopark.

This is the way I feel about online games. It's possible to increase advantage over the 64 squares and pieces by a computer.

I do not use a computer to play my games.
I have no access to anything but the place where you can set up your game to see if you really can checkmate your opponent, by one move.

Bobby Fischer said he could see only two moves ahead.

kindly,
John