|
|
From | Comment | ||
---|---|---|---|
phonybenoni 23-Apr-18, 00:54 » Report abuse |
|||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() phonybenoni hit the nail on the head. I initially dismissed the solution because I didn't see the response to 1...Rxg6. I came back to it because, well...it has to be right. No other pieces can move and no other destination provides sufficient coverage. Very elegant construction. (P.S. phonybenoni, your commenting style has developed an elegance of its own. Your thoughtful notes are much appreciated. Makes up for the good professor donnaclara's absence.) |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() Ingenious composition & difficult enough to warrant 3½ stars so gave 4. |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
» Report abuse |
![]() |
||
snailmate 08-Jan-25, 06:03 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
nea_caissa 08-Jan-25, 16:03 » Report abuse |
![]() |
||
snailmate 09-Jan-25, 07:48 » Report abuse |
![]() |
![]() Please log in to post comments.
|
Also, consider the 1...Rg4 defense. In the diagram that is answered by 2.Nf4#, possible because the Bf6 now covers h4. However, White can't maintain that without conceding something else. What to do?