From | Message | ||
---|---|---|---|
|
![]() No ads! 50 games 8 mini-tournaments 10 post game computer analysis per month Faster page loading! Access to all your past games (past games older than 30 days are automatically deleted for free accounts) Play in Chess League Compete in Ladders Participate in Clubs Play in several tournaments at the same time (unlimited) Postpone your games for up to 30 days and use up to 120 vacation days per year total Automatic emergency postponement protection Unlimited access to Chess Tactics Larger profile picture and avatar Detailed rating graphs for all players Download PGN archives of all your active and past games, as well as other players' games Unlimited access to game database Advanced player search More criteria for automatic challenge decline rules Post in team and club forums There should be a lower level for those who don't use them all so nothing is wasted. I only want the features of: No ads ~30 games is enough ~4 mini-tournaments is good enough Faster page loading Access to all your past games/Download PGN archives Postpone your games for up to 30 days and use up to 120 vacation days per year total Automatic emergency postponement protection Unlimited access to Chess Tactics The ability not to count as one of the limited free players on a team Unlimited access to game database Just team forums posting. I don't care about clubs. |
||
ketchuplover 14-Dec-14, 23:21 |
![]() |
||
saintinsanity 15-Dec-14, 00:27 |
![]() |
||
ketchuplover 30-Jul-18, 13:34 |
![]() |
||
yon_cassius 31-Jul-18, 01:14 |
![]() Just as an example: say someone wanted a higher level of membership where they could have more than 200 games simultaneously... they would probably want in vain: the number of players who play 190+ games is very small. As for being able to purchase individual features, that would be great! I can get a 100 analyses a month, and it's nowhere near enough! If only there was a way I could get another 100 (or 200) on top of that! I think individual features, even if Gameknot were willing to do that would (necessarily) be quite expensive: the amount of effort involved, how disruptive it would be, how many players would benefit, how long would it take GK to recoup the costs of implementing it etc. |
||
|
![]() Just to let me know they still hanging around 😋 |
||
|
![]() |
||
|
![]() What's this ? Like a treasure hunt ? |