| From | Message |
|---|---|
|
woutstra 22-Dec-10, 06:06 |
chess puzzlesI also quite enjoy solving puzzles even tough I'm not that good one thing puzzles(yay for puns) me a bit I often see puzzles/chess tactics puzzles that could be mate in 2-3 but they change in mate in 6 because they have a 2 rooks and a bishop placed on the other side of the board which wouldn't effect the puzzle at all is there a reason why you should keep those in? it seems to me that if you have a mate in two stretched out like that it kind of obscures the lesson the puzzle is teaching you (not sure if obscure is the right word to use) can't find an example but I'm sure you know what I mean -Woutstra |
|
kingdawar 22-Dec-10, 15:44 |
puzzle #32550 - what sequence do you want to show?)
|
|
kingdawar 22-Dec-10, 15:56 |
|
|
woutstra 22-Dec-10, 16:07 |
|
|
woutstra 22-Dec-10, 16:14 |
wich now I think about it doesn't matter wich you do first |